-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 168
Document in which cases only master key encryption will work (or is suggested) #4179
Comments
@mmattel, is this still required? |
We have to check if the text in the main encryption document contains notes about restrictions or better to say impacts on the decision to other apps. |
Would you or @voroyam mind sorting that out? |
I have rewritten the current document for the encryption. Many things were dropped as result. @mmattel can you tell me exactly what you are looking for? I am unaware of limitations that would only work with master key. Also this might be a unnecessary pursuit because user key will become deprecated in the future. Or am I wrong in this issue? |
@mmattel ^ |
so far we only changed the priority as shown in the UI: master key appears first, user-key next. we might deprecate it in the future but there are no concrete plans for that @pmaier1 @voroyam regarding limitations, it seems not all are documented in the page above.
@cdamken do you remember the other ones ? |
Ye, I swapped them after writing the quick guide.
What I don't know I can't write :) If @cdamken or someone else points me in the right direction, I could write up the limitations. |
I went through the current tickets in core and only found owncloud/core#16332 as limitation. There's another one I remember, it's that if you use user-key encryption with external storages, if the admin adds new users to an existing system-wide external storage (aka admin defined external storage) they also cannot decrypt the files. This is very similar to the group sharing one. |
We are still discussing. As user-based storage encryption does not provide a real-world benefit (except obscurity maybe) but creates a lot of problems and might even let unexperienced people think they're secure while they aren't (!) we will deprecate and remove it sooner or later, yes. Some more input that came up to my mind:
|
|
|
@PVince81 where do you think should this warnings be added? I suppose somewhere on this page, right? But where? https://doc.owncloud.org/server/10.0/admin_manual/configuration/files/encryption_configuration.html |
one thing is popping up: |
|
@mmattel, is this still actively in progress? |
There is still no content created which is imho a must to give admins advice and limitations. I am not an encryption expert, I just highlighted the case as I see the issues/discussions/notes |
@voroyam I think the current list is enough for now, thanks |
Okay, what's left to figure out is the place and wording. I have a draft here, please review @PVince81 @pmaier1 @mmattel @settermjd |
Closing as the implementing PR has been merged. |
Refs:
#3464 (Draft OAuth2 Documentation)... when using OAuth2 andShibboleth
#4169 (Create encryption_configuration_quick_guide.rst)
The Shibboleth Doc?
Other places?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: