You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current "solution" is to use a larger tolerance such as 1e-7, which shouldn't affect downstream tasks such as trajectory optimization. But if I really want to get to the bottom of this, I suspect the non-deterministic behavior is a result of drake's MathematicalProgram.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
JoseBarreiros-TRI
added a commit
to JoseBarreiros-TRI/quasistatic_simulator
that referenced
this issue
Feb 1, 2023
When comparing the gradients of the quasistatic dynamics using the python and cpp implementations, the tight tolerance can be satisfied about 9 out of 10 times. When the tolerance is not satisfied, the forward simulation results are also slightly off.
The current "solution" is to use a larger tolerance such as
1e-7
, which shouldn't affect downstream tasks such as trajectory optimization. But if I really want to get to the bottom of this, I suspect the non-deterministic behavior is a result of drake'sMathematicalProgram
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: