Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Kusama Validators Litep2p - Monitoring and Feedback #7076

Open
1 task
lexnv opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 3 comments
Open
1 task

Kusama Validators Litep2p - Monitoring and Feedback #7076

lexnv opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@lexnv
Copy link
Contributor

lexnv commented Jan 7, 2025

This is a placeholder issue for the community (kusama validators) to share their feedback, monitoring and logs.

We’re excited to announce the next step in improving the Kusama network with the introduction of litep2p—a more resource-efficient network backend. We need your help to make this transition successful!

Enable Litep2p Backend

We’re gradually rolling out litep2p across all validators. Here’s how you can help:

  1. Ensure you're running the latest Polkadot release (version 2412 or newer).
  2. Restart your node with the following flag
--network-backend litep2p

Rollout Plan

  • Phase 1: We need around 100 validators to start the transition.
  • Phase 2 (in a few days): Increase to 500 validators running litep2p.
  • Phase 3: Full rollout—inviting all validators to switch.

Monitoring & Feedback

Please keep an eye on your node after restarting and report any warnings or errors you encounter. In the first 15–30 minutes after the restart, you may see some temporary warnings, such as:

    Some network error occurred when fetching erasure chunk
    Low connectivity

We'd like to pay special attention to at least the following metrics:

  • Sync peers (substrate_sync_peers)
  • Block height (substrate_block_height)

Tasks

Preview Give feedback
@lexnv lexnv added this to Networking Jan 7, 2025
@alexggh
Copy link
Contributor

alexggh commented Jan 7, 2025

This is a concern for me: #7077, we should pay attention to this.

@alexggh
Copy link
Contributor

alexggh commented Jan 8, 2025

This is a concern for me: #7077, we should pay attention to this.

And this is the impact, I assume it was because validators restarted to use litep2p, but we should keep an eye on this if it is keep repeating.

Screenshot 2025-01-08 at 11 50 49

https://grafana.teleport.parity.io/goto/-FyJtnvNg?orgId=1

@alexggh
Copy link
Contributor

alexggh commented Jan 9, 2025

This is a concern for me: #7077, we should pay attention to this.

And this is the impact, I assume it was because validators restarted to use litep2p, but we should keep an eye on this if it is keep repeating.

Confirm with paranodes, he had some validators that were constantly restarting, so that was the reason for this finality delays.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants