The Legal Form Vocabulary vocabulary defined in RDFS allows to describe legal forms under which individuals or organizations carry on some kind of economic, charitable or in other ways beneficial activity. This includes but is not limited to forms of the private law such as the European SE or the German GmbH; But also cooperatives, associations or forms of the public law. The status of a legal form is usually gained by some formal registration within a jurisdiction but this is not always the case.
The vocabulary is available in the following serializations:
This vocabulary has been developed by n-fuse GmbH and is intended for public use.
We consider the overall status experimental but it may already be used productively.
How to contribute
- Express legal forms in the terms of LFOV
- Map other ontologies to LFOV
- Comment on the specification
- Change the current draft
Revision history
{GIT_CHANGES}
This section is non-normative.
The namespace of the Legal Form vocabulary is
https://w3id.org/legal_form#
and the preferred prefix is lfov
.
A full set of namespaces and prefixes used in this document is shown in the table below.
Prefix | Namespace |
---|---|
rov | http://www.w3.org/ns/regorg# |
org | http://www.w3.org/ns/org# |
skos | http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core# |
xsd | http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# |
This section is non-normative.
The key class is lfov:LegalForm
which represents a legal form.
The exact properties of a legal form are defined by the legislative authorities
within its corresponding jurisdiction.
This vocabulary defines properties to formally describe
general aspects of a legal form – e. g. whether it is a commercial
or non-commercial one.
This vocabulary makes use of classes and properties from several
other vocabularies. Essential are the org:classification
from
The Organization Ontology
and the skos:Concept
from the
Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS).
- Classes:
-
- [lfov:LegalForm](#the-legal-form-class)
- Properties:
-
- [lfov:name](#name)
- [lfov:acronym](#acronym)
- [lfov:legislation](#legislation)
- [lfov:limitedLiability](#limitedLiability)
- [lfov:shared](#shared)
This section is non-normative.
The following is an example of a legal form defin in Germany which is described using the Legal Form vocabulary (in JSON-LD):
<http://legalforms.org/indivbiz> a <https://w3id.org/legal_form#LegalForm> ;
lfov:name "Einzelunternehmen"@de,
"Sole Trader"@en-GB,
"Sole Proprietorship"@en-US ;
<legislation> "http://sws.geonames.org/2921044/" ;
<limitedLiability> false .
Use of an instance of a legal form
<http://business.data.gov.uk/id/company/04285910>
a rov:RegisteredOrganization ;
rov:legalName "Apple Binding Ltd" ;
rov:orgStatus <http://example.com/ref/status/NormalActivity> ;
rov:orgType <http://legalforms.org/indivbiz> ;
This section is non-normative.
Individuals of the class lfov:LegalForm
are intended to be objects of
the rov:orgType
property. Therefore, it is typed as rdfs:Class
and skos:Concept
.
The classes and properties are described in the following sub-sections.
Class | Notes |
---|---|
lfov:LegalForm |
Type
rdfs:Class and
skos:Concept
|
The Legal Form class is central to the vocabulary; It represents a legal form.
Property | Domain | Range |
---|---|---|
lfov:name
|
lfov:LegalForm
|
rdf:langString
|
The name defined by law.
Property | Domain | Range |
---|---|---|
lfov:acronym
|
lfov:LegalForm
|
rdf:langString
|
The acronym defined by law.
Property | Domain | Range |
---|---|---|
lfov:legislation
|
lfov:LegalForm
|
|
Legislation (e. g. a country or a union thereof), in which this legal form is defined.
Property | Domain | Range |
---|---|---|
lfov:limitedLiability
|
lfov:LegalForm
|
xsd:boolean
|
The owners or members of the legal entity are not personally liable for the company's debts.
Property | Domain | Range |
---|---|---|
lfov:shared
|
lfov:LegalForm
|
xsd:boolean
|
Defines whether the capital or the ownership itself is divided into shares.
As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative.
The key words must, must not, required, should, should not, recommended, may, and optional in this specification are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119.
A data interchange, however that interchange occurs, is conformant with the Legal Form vocabulary if:
- it uses the terms (classes and properties) in a way consistent with their semantics as declared in this specification;
- it does not use terms from other vocabularies instead of ones defined in this vocabulary that could reasonably be used.
A conforming data interchange:
- may include terms from other vocabularies;
- may use only a subset of Legal Form vocabulary terms.
A Legal Form application profile is a specification for data interchange that adds additional constraints. Such additional constraints in a profile may include:
- a minimum set of required terms;
- classes and properties for additional terms not covered in the Legal Form vocabulary;
- controlled vocabularies or URI sets as acceptable values for properties;
The Legal Form vocabulary is technology-neutral and a publisher may use any of the terms defined in this document encoded in any technology although RDF and XML are preferred.