You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
for some unknown reason, all energy that is not attributed to a sector in the Energy Balances got previously attributed to residential.
I think we would get to a more robust solution if we aggregate all the sectoral FE per carrier and then distribute the ONONSPEC equally to all demands for a certain FE carrier - so that if ONONSPEC-Liquids makes up 5% of all sectoral liquids FE demand, both transport, buildings and industry FE liquids demands get increased by 5% - and not, as is now the case, buildings liquids demand gets increased by 30%
this would require some additional correction in the production of the FE values from the IEA energy balances - I can describe the required algorithm, but I cannot implement it.
for some unknown reason, all energy that is not attributed to a sector in the Energy Balances got previously attributed to residential.
I think we would get to a more robust solution if we aggregate all the sectoral FE per carrier and then distribute the ONONSPEC equally to all demands for a certain FE carrier - so that if ONONSPEC-Liquids makes up 5% of all sectoral liquids FE demand, both transport, buildings and industry FE liquids demands get increased by 5% - and not, as is now the case, buildings liquids demand gets increased by 30%
this would require some additional correction in the production of the FE values from the IEA energy balances - I can describe the required algorithm, but I cannot implement it.
@fbenke-pik would you be able to do this?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: