Container is 970GB big #739
Closed
timkolloch
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Similar to #720 - this is solved from commit 130ab00 - when one of the long running services such as the web server is not working, it crashes the entire container, instead of trying to restart internally. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
When I tried to install an apt package on my debian server I got the response that I did not have enough storage to download the package.
After some fiddeling around I saw that my ddns-updater container was 970GB leaving me with literally no space left on my hard drive.
The container probably ran for almost a year with our being removed but 970GB in logs or anything still seems way too much.
Did someone else make a similiar observation?
Sadly I needed to remove the whole container because I really couldn't do anything so I cannot look into it anymore.
Edit
I may have found a reason for why it got so big. I forgot that I made some changes to rule out a problem which left the container running (for a few day at most) on a port which was already in use this I always got an error message stating that. The container did not run for a year or so. However below is the log of not even one second (I needed to remove a lot because the body was too long).
I do not know if a few days doing this might lead to 970GB in container size but it definetly played a role.
I guess one can argue "shit in shit out" but I think this gets logged way too often so one might want to change that.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions