Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

nit: better wording in sig_ack rationale #95

Open
darosior opened this issue Jul 13, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

nit: better wording in sig_ack rationale #95

darosior opened this issue Jul 13, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@darosior
Copy link
Member

The watchtower must not send an ACK if it did not successfully reconstruct

Could be

The watchtower must set "ack" to false if it did not successfully reconstruct

As it still needs to reply!
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@darosior @danielabrozzoni