bseti.S use bset rather than bseti

[Squareless-XD]

In ./isa/rv64uzbs/bseti.S, bset is used in instructions rather than bseti, which triggers "Illegal Instruction" in my cross-compiler when compiling. Is this a typo in the code, or is it only caused by a certain compiler?

[aswaterman]

bset with an immediate argument is a pseudoinstruction for bseti. The test is correct as-is. The most likely explanation is that you don't have the Zbs extension enabled.

[zxcvbnm1asdf23]

bset with an immediate argument is a pseudoinstruction for bseti. The test is correct as-is. The most likely explanation is that you don't have the Zbs extension enabled.

I also encountered the same problem. After replacing bset in bseti.s with bseti, gcc compilation passed. Is it possible that the gcc version is not the latest?

[aswaterman]

Is it possible that the gcc version is not the latest?

binutils version rather than gcc version, but yes, that is likely the explanation. (Sorry, I don’t know offhand which version is sufficient.)