Questions about SBOM specifications for tag:value

[yakuri]

Greetings, Let me ask a question about the SBOM specification for tag:value.
I received an SBOM described in SDPX v2.2 tag:value format.
test-sbom.spdx.txt

The SBOM described FilesAnalyzed under Relationships as follows.
Is this writing style correct as a tag:value specification?

Question Background: The VALIDATE results are different between tools-python and tools-java.

tools-python: VALIDATE failed
tools-java: VALIDATE success

## Package Information
PackageName: TestPackage1
SPDXID: SPDXRef-package-test1
PackageVersion: 1.0.0
PackageSupplier: NOASSERTION
PackageOriginator: Organization: test
PackageDownloadLocation: NOASSERTION
PackageLicenseConcluded: NOASSERTION
PackageLicenseDeclared: NOASSERTION
PackageCopyrightText: NOASSERTION
## Relationships
Relationship: SPDXRef-package-test1 DYNAMIC_LINK SPDXRef-package-test2
Relationship: SPDXRef-package-test1 DYNAMIC_LINK SPDXRef-package-test3
FilesAnalyzed: false

Sincerely,

[goneall]

from the Composition of and SPDX Document section, it looks like the properties in the package information should all precede the relationships section.

It looks like the SPDX python validator is correct and the SPDX Java tools should have flagged this as invalid.

[yakuri]

Hi, @goneall

Thanks for your reply.
I understood the above.

SPDX Java tools should have flagged this as invalid.

The above matter is being currently confirming at spdx/tools-java#182 .