Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

edk2-libc - Enhance Stdlib for supporting Aarch64 and ARM (Bugzilla Bug 4570) #74

Open
tianocore-issues opened this issue Oct 20, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@tianocore-issues
Copy link

This issue was created automatically with bugzilla2github

Bugzilla Bug 4570

Date: 2023-10-20T03:03:38+00:00
From: Jayaprakash Nevara <<n.jayaprakash>>
To: unassigned <>
CC:

Last updated: 2023-10-20T10:04:51+00:00

@tianocore-issues
Copy link
Author

Comment 22023

Date: 2023-10-20 03:03:38 +0000
From: Jayaprakash Nevara <<n.jayaprakash>>

  • Industry Specification: ---
  • Release Observed: EDK II Master
  • Releases to Fix: EDK II Master
  • Target OS: ---
  • Bugzilla Assignee(s): unassigned <>

Need to enhance the edk2-libc StdLib with the following changes to make it compile on Aarch64, ARM architectures and also add support for parsing long and short types in getopt library.

Add format macros for int types to Aarch64 and ARM, fix bugs in Ia32 and X64 definitions.
Add macros that can be used for compatibility that define when socklen_t has been defined.
Add getopt_long parser from OpenBSD to provide long and short option parsing capability with getopt.

@tianocore-issues
Copy link
Author

Comment 22024

Date: 2023-10-20 03:04:03 +0000
From: Jayaprakash Nevara <<n.jayaprakash>>

Confirming the BZ

@tianocore-issues
Copy link
Author

Comment 22025

Date: 2023-10-20 03:04:28 +0000
From: Jayaprakash Nevara <<n.jayaprakash>>

This bug has been raised for the PR #3

@tianocore-issues
Copy link
Author

Comment 22028

Date: 2023-10-20 10:04:51 +0000
From: Jayaprakash Nevara <<n.jayaprakash>>

Submitted the email patch for review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant