You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Among the claims you make, are: "Fault tolerance (immune to corruption, partial writes, process races, etc)" and "Consistency guarantees on read and write (full data verification)". These two claims stand out to me, but what I'm curious about also applies to the other claims. What kind of verification have you done, and keep doing to ensure these claims? As Kyle Kingsbury can certainly attest, many distributed systems make claims in a similar vain, but many don't uphold what they promise. I'd appreciate if you explain your taken steps for validating such claims not only here but also in the README. So future readers can more easily evaluate the trust they place in this software.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Among the claims you make, are: "Fault tolerance (immune to corruption, partial writes, process races, etc)" and "Consistency guarantees on read and write (full data verification)". These two claims stand out to me, but what I'm curious about also applies to the other claims. What kind of verification have you done, and keep doing to ensure these claims? As Kyle Kingsbury can certainly attest, many distributed systems make claims in a similar vain, but many don't uphold what they promise. I'd appreciate if you explain your taken steps for validating such claims not only here but also in the README. So future readers can more easily evaluate the trust they place in this software.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: