Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DO NOT MERGE] Generate tendlc sdk for portal work #30382

Draft
wants to merge 39 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sofiar-msft
Copy link
Member

Packages impacted by this PR

Issues associated with this PR

Describe the problem that is addressed by this PR

What are the possible designs available to address the problem? If there are more than one possible design, why was the one in this PR chosen?

Are there test cases added in this PR? (If not, why?)

Provide a list of related PRs (if any)

Command used to generate this PR:**(Applicable only to SDK release request PRs)

Checklists

  • Added impacted package name to the issue description
  • Does this PR needs any fixes in the SDK Generator?** (If so, create an Issue in the Autorest/typescript repository and link it here)
  • Added a changelog (if necessary)

@azure-sdk
Copy link
Collaborator

azure-sdk commented Jul 11, 2024

API change check

APIView has identified API level changes in this PR and created following API reviews.

@azure-tools/communication-ten-dlc

@sofiar-msft
Copy link
Member Author

/azp run js - communication-phone-numbers build

Copy link

Pull request contains merge conflicts.

@sofiar-msft sofiar-msft reopened this Oct 30, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue. label Oct 30, 2024
@sofiar-msft sofiar-msft changed the title Generate tendlc sdk for portal work [DO NOT MERGE] Generate tendlc sdk for portal work Oct 30, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 3, 2025

Hi @sofiar-msft. Thank you for your interest in helping to improve the Azure SDK experience and for your contribution. We've noticed that there hasn't been recent engagement on this pull request. If this is still an active work stream, please let us know by pushing some changes or leaving a comment. Otherwise, we'll close this out in 7 days.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue. label Jan 3, 2025
Copy link

Hi @sofiar-msft. Thank you for your contribution. Since there hasn't been recent engagement, we're going to close this out. Feel free to respond with a comment containing /reopen if you'd like to continue working on these changes. Please be sure to use the command to reopen or remove the no-recent-activity label; otherwise, this is likely to be closed again with the next cleanup pass.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jan 10, 2025
@sofiar-msft sofiar-msft reopened this Jan 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the no-recent-activity There has been no recent activity on this issue. label Jan 17, 2025
@sofiar-msft sofiar-msft marked this pull request as draft January 17, 2025 21:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants