Fix Issue #1090, (#1108)

max, min on positional was not respected, specifically max positionals
only filled up to min, and skipped over optional options.

Fixes #1090

---------

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

include/CLI/impl/App_inl.hpp

@@ -1731,7 +1731,7 @@ CLI11_INLINE bool App::_parse_positional(std::vector<std::string> &args, bool ha
         for(const Option_p &opt : options_) {
             // Eat options, one by one, until done
             if(opt->get_positional() &&
-               (static_cast<int>(opt->count()) < opt->get_items_expected_min() || opt->get_allow_extra_args())) {
+               (static_cast<int>(opt->count()) < opt->get_items_expected_max() || opt->get_allow_extra_args())) {
                 if(validate_positionals_) {
                     std::string pos = positional;
                     pos = opt->_validate(pos, 0);

tests/AppTest.cpp

@@ -1236,6 +1236,56 @@ TEST_CASE_METHOD(TApp, "RequiredOptsDoubleNeg", "[app]") {
     CHECK(std::vector<std::string>({"one", "two"}) == strs);
 }
 
+TEST_CASE_METHOD(TApp, "ExpectedRangeParam", "[app]") {
+
+    app.add_option("-s")->required()->expected(2, 4);
+
+    args = {"-s", "one"};
+
+    CHECK_THROWS_AS(run(), CLI::ArgumentMismatch);
+
+    args = {"-s", "one", "two"};
+
+    CHECK_NOTHROW(run());
+
+    args = {"-s", "one", "two", "three"};
+
+    CHECK_NOTHROW(run());
+
+    args = {"-s", "one", "two", "three", "four"};
+
+    CHECK_NOTHROW(run());
+
+    args = {"-s", "one", "two", "three", "four", "five"};
+
+    CHECK_THROWS_AS(run(), CLI::ExtrasError);
+}
+
+TEST_CASE_METHOD(TApp, "ExpectedRangePositional", "[app]") {
+
+    app.add_option("arg")->required()->expected(2, 4);
+
+    args = {"one"};
+
+    CHECK_THROWS_AS(run(), CLI::ArgumentMismatch);
+
+    args = {"one", "two"};
+
+    CHECK_NOTHROW(run());
+
+    args = {"one", "two", "three"};
+
+    CHECK_NOTHROW(run());
+
+    args = {"one", "two", "three", "four"};
+
+    CHECK_NOTHROW(run());
+
+    args = {"one", "two", "three", "four", "five"};
+
+    CHECK_THROWS_AS(run(), CLI::ExtrasError);
+}
+
 // This makes sure unlimited option priority is
 // correct for space vs. no space #90
 TEST_CASE_METHOD(TApp, "PositionalNoSpace", "[app]") {