Defined notes for BSI SYS.1.6.A17

[lichtblaugue]

Description:

Added notes and controls for BSI SYS.1.6 A17

Rationale:

As we have multiple customers asking for a BSI profile to be included in the compliance-operator, we are contributing a profile. To provide a better review process, the individual controle are implemented as separate PRs.

[openshift-ci]

Hi @lichtblaugue. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[github-actions]

Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request:

ocp4 (from CTF) Environment (using Fedora as testing environment)

Fedora Testing Environment

Oracle Linux 8 Environment

[sluetze]

please do not add the same content, which is already existing in other PRs / commits. just rebase on that branch or wait until the other branch is merged

[github-actions]

This datastream diff is auto generated by the check Compare DS/Generate Diff

Click here to see the full diff

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_general_node_separation'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_general_node_separation
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_general_node_separation
@@ -15,5 +15,8 @@
 [reference]:
 SYS.1.6.A3
 
+[reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A26
+
 [rationale]:
 Assigning workloads with high protection requirements to specific nodes creates and additional boundary (the node) between workloads of high protection requirements and workloads which might follow less strict requirements. An adversary which attacked a lighter protected workload now has additional obstacles for their movement towards the higher protected workloads.

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_drop_container_capabilities'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_drop_container_capabilities
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_drop_container_capabilities
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_container_allowed_capabilities'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_container_allowed_capabilities
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_container_allowed_capabilities
@@ -74,6 +74,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_dir_volume_plugin'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_dir_volume_plugin
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_dir_volume_plugin
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 CNTR-OS-000660
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_ports'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_ports
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_host_ports
@@ -21,6 +21,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 CNTR-OS-000660
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_ipc_namespace'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_ipc_namespace
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_ipc_namespace
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_net_raw_capability'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_net_raw_capability
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_net_raw_capability
@@ -40,6 +40,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_network_namespace'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_network_namespace
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_network_namespace
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privilege_escalation'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privilege_escalation
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privilege_escalation
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privileged_containers'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privileged_containers
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_privileged_containers
@@ -42,6 +42,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_process_id_namespace'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_process_id_namespace
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_process_id_namespace
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

New content has different text for rule 'xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_root_containers'.
--- xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_root_containers
+++ xccdf_org.ssgproject.content_rule_scc_limit_root_containers
@@ -39,6 +39,9 @@
 APP.4.4.A9
 
 [reference]:
+SYS.1.6.A17
+
+[reference]:
 2.2.1
 
 [reference]:

[codeclimate]

Code Climate has analyzed commit c880d3b and detected 0 issues on this pull request.

The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold).

This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 60.9% (0.0% change).

View more on Code Climate.

[yuumasato]

/ok-to-test

[yuumasato]

/test 4.17-e2e-aws-ocp4-bsi
/test 4.17-e2e-aws-ocp4-bsi-node
/test 4.17-e2e-aws-rhcos4-bsi

[openshift-ci]

@lichtblaugue: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/4.17-e2e-aws-ocp4-bsi	c880d3b	link	true	/test 4.17-e2e-aws-ocp4-bsi

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[yuumasato]

Before waiting for the mcp to be updated, this script needs to wait for the mcp to exist.
Similar to what was done in line 10.

[sluetze]

Hi @yuumasato ,

this PR should not include https://github.com/ComplianceAsCode/content/pull/12530/files/8e36b6428e1e65122ec3aa8b1cac0284c06c1ad1..14ae93f598e984653248f96215f068f6f746d2e4

as this is done in #12494

I will help @lichtblaugue to remove this commits from the PR and consider your comment in the pull/12494

[lichtblaugue]

Closing in favor of
#12663