Fix the _rule_id and var access in template.py of pam_account_password_faillock #12778
Conversation
|
Hi @alanmcanonical. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a ComplianceAsCode member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Start a new ephemeral environment with changes proposed in this pull request: Fedora Environment Oracle Linux 8 Environment |
| @@ -11,6 +11,6 @@ def preprocess(data, lang): | |||
| type(data.get(var)) != int: | |||
| errmsg = ("The template instance of the rule {0} requires the " | |||
| "parameter {1} is either 'use_ext_variable' or " | |||
| "a number or undefined".formate(_rule_id, var)) | |||
| "a number or undefined".formate(data["_rule_id"], date["var"])) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "a number or undefined".formate(data["_rule_id"], date["var"])) | |
| "a number or undefined".format(data["_rule_id"], data["var"])) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@alanmcanonical you still have date instead of data there
There was a problem hiding this comment.
fixed the date typo
alanmcanonical
force-pushed
the
fix_rule_id_templatepy
branch
from
6f65518 to
f92ed0d
Compare
|
Code Climate has analyzed commit f92ed0d and detected 0 issues on this pull request. The test coverage on the diff in this pull request is 100.0% (50% is the threshold). This pull request will bring the total coverage in the repository to 61.6% (0.0% change). View more on Code Climate. |
Description: