Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CI Visibility] Test session logical names #6050

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024

Conversation

tonyredondo
Copy link
Member

@tonyredondo tonyredondo commented Sep 18, 2024

Summary of changes

This PR implements a new CI Visibility feature called Test session logical names. In this feature a new DD_TEST_SESSION_NAME environment variable is introduced for customer to set their custom test session name. This name is sent to the backend inside the metadata object in the CI Visibility protocol.

PR to change the intake json: https://github.com/DataDog/dd-go/pull/150765

Reason for change

New feature: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XPBDDIMUxzfkko66vXIEjoi4xbCamTz-Bv6ChSR8jys/edit

Implementation details

  • A new ConfigurationKey.CIVisibility environment variable
  • A new CIVisibility.Settings property
  • Changes to the CIEventMessagePackFormatter to include this new tag inside the metadata object.

Test coverage

Added a metadata validator in the EVP tests (CI Visibility protocol)

Add the configuration value to the config_norm_rules.json
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from datadog-ddstaging bot Sep 18, 2024
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from andrewlock Sep 18, 2024
@tonyredondo tonyredondo marked this pull request as ready for review September 18, 2024 13:59
@tonyredondo tonyredondo requested review from a team as code owners September 18, 2024 13:59
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from andrewlock Sep 18, 2024
@DataDog DataDog deleted a comment from andrewlock Sep 18, 2024
@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Sep 18, 2024

Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️

Execution-time results for samples comparing the following branches/commits:

Execution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program. And are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are shown in red. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:

  • Welch test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 5% and 5 ms are considered.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard.

Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph).

gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6050) - mean (69ms)  : 67, 71
     .   : milestone, 69,
    master - mean (71ms)  : 66, 75
     .   : milestone, 71,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6050) - mean (1,137ms)  : 1003, 1272
     .   : milestone, 1137,
    master - mean (1,107ms)  : 1076, 1137
     .   : milestone, 1107,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6050) - mean (108ms)  : 105, 111
     .   : milestone, 108,
    master - mean (110ms)  : 107, 113
     .   : milestone, 110,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6050) - mean (785ms)  : 745, 825
     .   : milestone, 785,
    master - mean (804ms)  : 782, 825
     .   : milestone, 804,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6050) - mean (92ms)  : 90, 94
     .   : milestone, 92,
    master - mean (94ms)  : 91, 97
     .   : milestone, 94,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6050) - mean (738ms)  : 714, 762
     .   : milestone, 738,
    master - mean (753ms)  : 734, 773
     .   : milestone, 753,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.6.2) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6050) - mean (191ms)  : 189, 194
     .   : milestone, 191,
    master - mean (191ms)  : 186, 195
     .   : milestone, 191,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6050) - mean (1,204ms)  : 1176, 1232
     .   : milestone, 1204,
    master - mean (1,194ms)  : 1158, 1229
     .   : milestone, 1194,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6050) - mean (277ms)  : 273, 281
     .   : milestone, 277,
    master - mean (276ms)  : 271, 280
     .   : milestone, 276,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6050) - mean (953ms)  : 932, 974
     .   : milestone, 953,
    master - mean (963ms)  : 939, 987
     .   : milestone, 963,

Loading
gantt
    title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    todayMarker off
    section Baseline
    This PR (6050) - mean (266ms)  : 263, 269
     .   : milestone, 266,
    master - mean (265ms)  : 260, 271
     .   : milestone, 265,

    section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
    This PR (6050) - mean (938ms)  : 911, 964
     .   : milestone, 938,
    master - mean (942ms)  : 917, 966
     .   : milestone, 942,

Loading

@@ -372,6 +372,7 @@
"DD_CIVISIBILITY_EARLY_FLAKE_DETECTION_ENABLED": "ci_visibility_early_flake_detection_enabled",
"DD_CIVISIBILITY_CODE_COVERAGE_COLLECTORPATH": "ci_visibility_code_coverage_collectorpath",
"DD_CIVISIBILITY_RUM_FLUSH_WAIT_MILLIS": "ci_visibility_rum_flush_wait_millis",
"DD_TEST_SESSION_NAME": "test_session_name",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I usually add the corresponding dd-go PR link to the PR's description so people don't complaint about it missing XD

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@daniel-romano-DD daniel-romano-DD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Sep 18, 2024

Benchmarks Report for tracer 🐌

Benchmarks for #6050 compared to master:

  • All benchmarks have the same speed
  • All benchmarks have the same allocations

The following thresholds were used for comparing the benchmark speeds:

  • Mann–Whitney U test with statistical test for significance of 5%
  • Only results indicating a difference greater than 10% and 0.3 ns are considered.

Allocation changes below 0.5% are ignored.

Benchmark details

Benchmarks.Trace.ActivityBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.69μs 43.2ns 312ns 0.0149 0.00374 0 5.43 KB
master StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.79μs 54.1ns 342ns 0.019 0.00475 0 5.62 KB
master StartStopWithChild net472 16.1μs 51.7ns 200ns 1.01 0.294 0.0875 6.06 KB
#6050 StartStopWithChild net6.0 7.8μs 44.6ns 318ns 0.0121 0.00402 0 5.42 KB
#6050 StartStopWithChild netcoreapp3.1 9.93μs 55.6ns 373ns 0.0205 0.00514 0 5.62 KB
#6050 StartStopWithChild net472 15.9μs 47.7ns 179ns 1.04 0.318 0.103 6.07 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AgentWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 483μs 198ns 715ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 639μs 436ns 1.69μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 832μs 626ns 2.34μs 0.414 0 0 3.3 KB
#6050 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 452μs 143ns 533ns 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6050 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 641μs 261ns 1.01μs 0 0 0 2.7 KB
#6050 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 833μs 704ns 2.73μs 0.414 0 0 3.3 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.AspNetCoreBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendRequest net6.0 200μs 1.15μs 9.13μs 0.185 0 0 18.45 KB
master SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 219μs 1.23μs 8.64μs 0.22 0 0 20.61 KB
master SendRequest net472 0.0027ns 0.000757ns 0.00273ns 0 0 0 0 b
#6050 SendRequest net6.0 196μs 1.12μs 8.67μs 0.19 0 0 18.45 KB
#6050 SendRequest netcoreapp3.1 215μs 1.05μs 4.19μs 0.204 0 0 20.61 KB
#6050 SendRequest net472 0.00754ns 0.00275ns 0.0103ns 0 0 0 0 b
Benchmarks.Trace.CIVisibilityProtocolWriterBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 547μs 1.84μs 6.63μs 0.553 0 0 41.63 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 685μs 3.71μs 20.3μs 0.329 0 0 41.77 KB
master WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 836μs 3.7μs 14.3μs 8.45 2.53 0.422 53.29 KB
#6050 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net6.0 567μs 2.54μs 9.51μs 0.568 0 0 41.54 KB
#6050 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces netcoreapp3.1 692μs 3.6μs 17.3μs 0.327 0 0 41.93 KB
#6050 WriteAndFlushEnrichedTraces net472 848μs 3.86μs 14.9μs 8.5 2.55 0.425 53.29 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.DbCommandBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.35μs 1.28ns 4.97ns 0.014 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.8μs 1.17ns 4.55ns 0.0133 0 0 1.02 KB
master ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.02μs 1.41ns 5.45ns 0.156 0 0 987 B
#6050 ExecuteNonQuery net6.0 1.34μs 1.7ns 6.58ns 0.0147 0 0 1.02 KB
#6050 ExecuteNonQuery netcoreapp3.1 1.74μs 0.813ns 3.15ns 0.013 0 0 1.02 KB
#6050 ExecuteNonQuery net472 2.01μs 2.69ns 10.4ns 0.156 0 0 987 B
Benchmarks.Trace.ElasticsearchBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.15μs 0.698ns 2.52ns 0.0138 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.56μs 0.499ns 1.8ns 0.0128 0 0 976 B
master CallElasticsearch net472 2.44μs 1.2ns 4.48ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.26μs 0.752ns 2.81ns 0.0132 0 0 952 B
master CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.57μs 1.55ns 6.01ns 0.0135 0 0 1.02 KB
master CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.73μs 1.84ns 6.9ns 0.166 0 0 1.05 KB
#6050 CallElasticsearch net6.0 1.27μs 0.447ns 1.61ns 0.014 0 0 976 B
#6050 CallElasticsearch netcoreapp3.1 1.61μs 0.693ns 2.59ns 0.0136 0 0 976 B
#6050 CallElasticsearch net472 2.43μs 2.39ns 8.93ns 0.158 0 0 995 B
#6050 CallElasticsearchAsync net6.0 1.23μs 0.726ns 2.72ns 0.0135 0 0 952 B
#6050 CallElasticsearchAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.63μs 3.66ns 14.2ns 0.0137 0 0 1.02 KB
#6050 CallElasticsearchAsync net472 2.58μs 2.19ns 8.48ns 0.166 0 0 1.05 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.GraphQLBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.19μs 0.718ns 2.69ns 0.0131 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.62μs 1.02ns 3.96ns 0.0129 0 0 952 B
master ExecuteAsync net472 1.76μs 0.559ns 2.16ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
#6050 ExecuteAsync net6.0 1.24μs 0.633ns 2.28ns 0.0131 0 0 952 B
#6050 ExecuteAsync netcoreapp3.1 1.59μs 0.493ns 1.85ns 0.0126 0 0 952 B
#6050 ExecuteAsync net472 1.78μs 1.47ns 5.7ns 0.145 0 0 915 B
Benchmarks.Trace.HttpClientBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendAsync net6.0 4.1μs 4.85ns 18.8ns 0.0306 0 0 2.22 KB
master SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.05μs 2.83ns 10.6ns 0.038 0 0 2.76 KB
master SendAsync net472 7.65μs 3.32ns 12.8ns 0.499 0 0 3.15 KB
#6050 SendAsync net6.0 4.16μs 2.16ns 8.08ns 0.0312 0 0 2.22 KB
#6050 SendAsync netcoreapp3.1 5.07μs 3.58ns 13.9ns 0.0381 0 0 2.76 KB
#6050 SendAsync net472 7.63μs 3.15ns 12.2ns 0.497 0 0 3.15 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.ILoggerBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 1.57μs 0.569ns 2.13ns 0.0228 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.12μs 3.39ns 12.7ns 0.0221 0 0 1.64 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 2.72μs 1.8ns 6.75ns 0.25 0 0 1.57 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog net6.0 1.61μs 0.867ns 3.36ns 0.0226 0 0 1.64 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 2.21μs 1.92ns 7.42ns 0.0231 0 0 1.64 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog net472 2.65μs 0.906ns 3.51ns 0.248 0 0 1.57 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.Log4netBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 113μs 154ns 596ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 118μs 179ns 694ns 0 0 0 4.28 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 146μs 178ns 689ns 0.651 0.217 0 4.46 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog net6.0 115μs 186ns 722ns 0.0574 0 0 4.28 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 119μs 142ns 549ns 0.0591 0 0 4.28 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog net472 147μs 199ns 772ns 0.656 0.219 0 4.46 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.NLogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 3.19μs 0.95ns 3.68ns 0.0302 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.12μs 1.85ns 6.66ns 0.0287 0 0 2.2 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.9μs 3.97ns 14.8ns 0.32 0 0 2.02 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.98μs 1.53ns 5.92ns 0.0312 0 0 2.2 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.13μs 1.67ns 6.23ns 0.029 0 0 2.2 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog net472 4.79μs 1.58ns 6.13ns 0.319 0 0 2.02 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.RedisBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master SendReceive net6.0 1.47μs 0.908ns 3.52ns 0.0161 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.86μs 1.16ns 4.49ns 0.0158 0 0 1.14 KB
master SendReceive net472 2.08μs 1.02ns 3.97ns 0.183 0 0 1.16 KB
#6050 SendReceive net6.0 1.43μs 0.799ns 3.1ns 0.0158 0 0 1.14 KB
#6050 SendReceive netcoreapp3.1 1.74μs 1.4ns 5.42ns 0.0151 0 0 1.14 KB
#6050 SendReceive net472 2.06μs 1.54ns 5.96ns 0.183 0.00103 0 1.16 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SerilogBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master EnrichedLog net6.0 2.8μs 1.76ns 6.59ns 0.0226 0 0 1.6 KB
master EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 3.96μs 1.97ns 7.37ns 0.0218 0 0 1.65 KB
master EnrichedLog net472 4.39μs 1.43ns 5.35ns 0.322 0 0 2.04 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog net6.0 2.74μs 0.51ns 1.98ns 0.0219 0 0 1.6 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog netcoreapp3.1 4.05μs 2.14ns 8.28ns 0.0223 0 0 1.65 KB
#6050 EnrichedLog net472 4.34μs 5.25ns 20.3ns 0.323 0 0 2.04 KB
Benchmarks.Trace.SpanBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master StartFinishSpan net6.0 418ns 0.121ns 0.468ns 0.00817 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 590ns 0.167ns 0.646ns 0.00769 0 0 576 B
master StartFinishSpan net472 642ns 0.215ns 0.834ns 0.0915 0 0 578 B
master StartFinishScope net6.0 486ns 0.165ns 0.64ns 0.00971 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 671ns 0.806ns 3.12ns 0.00935 0 0 696 B
master StartFinishScope net472 784ns 0.489ns 1.89ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6050 StartFinishSpan net6.0 404ns 0.127ns 0.491ns 0.00802 0 0 576 B
#6050 StartFinishSpan netcoreapp3.1 569ns 0.406ns 1.57ns 0.00784 0 0 576 B
#6050 StartFinishSpan net472 694ns 0.742ns 2.87ns 0.0917 0 0 578 B
#6050 StartFinishScope net6.0 477ns 0.17ns 0.636ns 0.00981 0 0 696 B
#6050 StartFinishScope netcoreapp3.1 686ns 0.307ns 1.15ns 0.00926 0 0 696 B
#6050 StartFinishScope net472 829ns 0.625ns 2.42ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
Benchmarks.Trace.TraceAnnotationsBenchmark - Same speed ✔️ Same allocations ✔️

Raw results

Branch Method Toolchain Mean StdError StdDev Gen 0 Gen 1 Gen 2 Allocated
master RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 646ns 0.251ns 0.904ns 0.00972 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 887ns 0.599ns 2.32ns 0.0093 0 0 696 B
master RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.05μs 0.715ns 2.68ns 0.104 0 0 658 B
#6050 RunOnMethodBegin net6.0 667ns 0.298ns 1.15ns 0.00965 0 0 696 B
#6050 RunOnMethodBegin netcoreapp3.1 967ns 0.572ns 2.21ns 0.00961 0 0 696 B
#6050 RunOnMethodBegin net472 1.1μs 0.843ns 3.26ns 0.104 0 0 658 B

@andrewlock
Copy link
Member

andrewlock commented Sep 18, 2024

Throughput/Crank Report ⚡

Throughput results for AspNetCoreSimpleController comparing the following branches/commits:

Cases where throughput results for the PR are worse than latest master (5% drop or greater), results are shown in red.

Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see one of the many, many dashboards!

gantt
    title Throughput Linux x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6050) (10.942M)   : 0, 10941686
    master (11.137M)   : 0, 11137434
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (11.081M)   : 0, 11080577

    section Automatic
    This PR (6050) (7.300M)   : 0, 7300227
    master (7.472M)   : 0, 7472267
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.732M)   : 0, 7732233

    section Trace stats
    master (7.740M)   : 0, 7739506

    section Manual
    master (11.147M)   : 0, 11147376

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6050) (6.738M)   : 0, 6737852
    master (6.885M)   : 0, 6884909

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (10.298M)   : 0, 10297627

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Linux arm64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6050) (9.566M)   : 0, 9565630
    master (9.458M)   : 0, 9457862
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (9.798M)   : 0, 9798067

    section Automatic
    This PR (6050) (6.366M)   : 0, 6366076
    master (6.697M)   : 0, 6697227

    section Trace stats
    master (6.870M)   : 0, 6870399

    section Manual
    master (9.399M)   : 0, 9399390

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6050) (6.171M)   : 0, 6171273
    master (6.259M)   : 0, 6258620

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (8.951M)   : 0, 8950555

Loading
gantt
    title Throughput Windows x64 (Total requests) 
    dateFormat  X
    axisFormat %s
    section Baseline
    This PR (6050) (10.128M)   : 0, 10128193
    master (9.738M)   : 0, 9737750
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (10.067M)   : 0, 10067315

    section Automatic
    This PR (6050) (6.663M)   : 0, 6663006
    master (6.696M)   : 0, 6696467
    benchmarks/2.9.0 (7.552M)   : 0, 7552193

    section Trace stats
    master (7.292M)   : 0, 7291705

    section Manual
    master (9.976M)   : 0, 9975574

    section Manual + Automatic
    This PR (6050) (6.055M)   : 0, 6055476
    master (6.215M)   : 0, 6215400

    section DD_TRACE_ENABLED=0
    master (9.307M)   : 0, 9307213

Loading

Copy link
Contributor

@bouwkast bouwkast left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

(I'm thinking I have the CODEOWNERS setup wrong for IDM as I think these shouldn't be owned by that team)

@tonyredondo tonyredondo merged commit cc814d2 into master Sep 19, 2024
77 of 84 checks passed
@tonyredondo tonyredondo deleted the tony/civisibility-test-session-logical-names branch September 19, 2024 14:50
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the vNext-v3 milestone Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants