Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cardano-testnet | Create transaction with two script certificates test #6082

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

carbolymer
Copy link
Contributor

@carbolymer carbolymer commented Jan 20, 2025

Description

Tests

Reproduces:

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • New tests are added if needed and existing tests are updated. These may include:
    • golden tests
    • property tests
    • roundtrip tests
    • integration tests
      See Runnings tests for more details
  • Any changes are noted in the CHANGELOG.md for affected package
  • The version bounds in .cabal files are updated
  • CI passes. See note on CI. The following CI checks are required:
    • Code is linted with hlint. See .github/workflows/check-hlint.yml to get the hlint version
    • Code is formatted with stylish-haskell. See .github/workflows/stylish-haskell.yml to get the stylish-haskell version
    • Code builds on Linux, MacOS and Windows for ghc-8.10.7 and ghc-9.2.7
  • Self-reviewed the diff

Note on CI

If your PR is from a fork, the necessary CI jobs won't trigger automatically for security reasons.
You will need to get someone with write privileges. Please contact IOG node developers to do this
for you.

@carbolymer carbolymer changed the title cardano-testnet | Create transaction with two script certificates cardano-testnet | Create transaction with two script certificates test Jan 20, 2025
@carbolymer carbolymer force-pushed the mgalazyn/test/two-script-certs-in-single-tx branch from d93509b to a964c00 Compare January 24, 2025 14:37
@carbolymer carbolymer marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2025 14:39
@carbolymer carbolymer requested a review from a team as a code owner January 24, 2025 14:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant