-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Non-mutating versions of pop, popfirst, etc. (#66) #68
Merged
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
268b8dc
Attempt at #66
Tokazama 4545de7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
Tokazama 47426c5
Use `Static`
Tokazama 62e3861
Add `indices(::Tuple)`
Tokazama ed85b75
Added `zero(::Static)` and `one(Static)`
Tokazama a486f64
Add eltype(::Static)
Tokazama 5c6ac4b
Clean up OptionallyStaticUnitRange implementation
Tokazama 14ba709
Deleted push/pop methods and added tuple support for deletat and insert
Tokazama dcbd6bb
Fix unsafe_length_unit_range
Tokazama f57b4e6
Rename testset "insert/deleteat"
Tokazama 66a9e6a
Add `Zero` and `One` constants
Tokazama d973c64
Ensure SIMD happens
Tokazama bc3447d
Switch Zero and One to from instances to types
Tokazama File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -33,10 +33,13 @@ end | |
Base.promote_rule(::Type{<:Static}, ::Type{<:Static}) = Int | ||
Base.:(%)(::Static{N}, ::Type{Integer}) where {N} = N | ||
|
||
Base.eltype(::Type{T}) where {T<:Static} = Int | ||
Base.iszero(::Static{0}) = true | ||
Base.iszero(::Static) = false | ||
Base.isone(::Static{1}) = true | ||
Base.isone(::Static) = false | ||
Base.zero(::Type{T}) where {T<:Static} = Static{0}() | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Maybe we even want to define aliases like |
||
Base.one(::Type{T}) where {T<:Static} = Static{1}() | ||
|
||
for T = [:Real, :Rational, :Integer] | ||
@eval begin | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would split this into separate loops. The compiler may do so automatically, but I'd rather not rely on it.
Something like:
to make sure it SIMDs well if possible.