-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improves/size #357
Improves/size #357
Conversation
md5.update(minId); | ||
md5.update(maxId); | ||
const bytes = Buffer.from(md5.digest().bytes(), 'binary'); | ||
const res = md5(minId + maxId); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Use of a broken or weak cryptographic algorithm High
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 2 months ago
To fix the problem, we should replace the use of the MD5 hashing algorithm with a stronger, modern cryptographic hash function. In this case, we can use SHA-256, which is a secure and widely recommended hash function.
- Replace the MD5 hash function with SHA-256 in the
uniqueConversationID
function. - Ensure that the rest of the code remains unchanged and continues to function as expected.
-
Copy modified lines R17-R18
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@ | ||
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort(); | ||
const res = md5(minId + maxId); | ||
const bytes = Buffer.from(res, 'hex'); | ||
const res = sha256.create().update(minId + maxId).digest(); | ||
const bytes = Buffer.from(res); | ||
|
const forgeUniqueConversationID = (userID: string, recipientID: string): string => { | ||
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort(); | ||
const md5 = md.md5.create(); | ||
md5.update(minId); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Use of a broken or weak cryptographic algorithm High test
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 2 months ago
To fix the problem, we need to replace the MD5 hashing algorithm with a stronger alternative, such as SHA-256. This involves changing the creation and usage of the hash object from MD5 to SHA-256. Specifically, we will:
- Replace
md.md5.create()
withmd.sha256.create()
. - Ensure that the rest of the code that uses the hash object remains compatible with the new algorithm.
-
Copy modified lines R21-R24
@@ -20,6 +20,6 @@ | ||
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort(); | ||
const md5 = md.md5.create(); | ||
md5.update(minId); | ||
md5.update(maxId); | ||
const bytes = Buffer.from(md5.digest().bytes(), 'binary'); | ||
const sha256 = md.sha256.create(); | ||
sha256.update(minId); | ||
sha256.update(maxId); | ||
const bytes = Buffer.from(sha256.digest().bytes(), 'binary'); | ||
|
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort(); | ||
const md5 = md.md5.create(); | ||
md5.update(minId); | ||
md5.update(maxId); |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Use of a broken or weak cryptographic algorithm High test
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
sensitive data from an access to userID
Show autofix suggestion
Hide autofix suggestion
Copilot Autofix AI 2 months ago
To fix the problem, we should replace the MD5 hashing algorithm with a stronger alternative, such as SHA-256. This change will ensure that the hashing process is more secure and resistant to collision attacks.
- General Fix: Replace the MD5 hashing algorithm with SHA-256.
- Detailed Fix: Modify the
forgeUniqueConversationID
function to use SHA-256 instead of MD5. This involves changing the instantiation of the hash object and updating the relevant method calls. - Specific Changes:
- Update the import statement to include SHA-256 if not already imported.
- Replace
md.md5.create()
withmd.sha256.create()
. - Ensure that the rest of the code in the function is compatible with the new hash object.
-
Copy modified lines R21-R24
@@ -20,6 +20,6 @@ | ||
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort(); | ||
const md5 = md.md5.create(); | ||
md5.update(minId); | ||
md5.update(maxId); | ||
const bytes = Buffer.from(md5.digest().bytes(), 'binary'); | ||
const sha256 = md.sha256.create(); | ||
sha256.update(minId); | ||
sha256.update(maxId); | ||
const bytes = Buffer.from(sha256.digest().bytes(), 'binary'); | ||
|
2b8b0e3
to
4a764ed
Compare
No description provided.