Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improves/size #357

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Improves/size #357

merged 16 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

hundredark
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

md5.update(minId);
md5.update(maxId);
const bytes = Buffer.from(md5.digest().bytes(), 'binary');
const res = md5(minId + maxId);

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Use of a broken or weak cryptographic algorithm High

A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.
A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.

Copilot Autofix AI 2 months ago

To fix the problem, we should replace the use of the MD5 hashing algorithm with a stronger, modern cryptographic hash function. In this case, we can use SHA-256, which is a secure and widely recommended hash function.

  • Replace the MD5 hash function with SHA-256 in the uniqueConversationID function.
  • Ensure that the rest of the code remains unchanged and continues to function as expected.
Suggested changeset 1
src/client/utils/uniq.ts

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/src/client/utils/uniq.ts b/src/client/utils/uniq.ts
--- a/src/client/utils/uniq.ts
+++ b/src/client/utils/uniq.ts
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@
   const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort();
-  const res = md5(minId + maxId);
-  const bytes = Buffer.from(res, 'hex');
+  const res = sha256.create().update(minId + maxId).digest();
+  const bytes = Buffer.from(res);
 
EOF
@@ -16,4 +16,4 @@
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort();
const res = md5(minId + maxId);
const bytes = Buffer.from(res, 'hex');
const res = sha256.create().update(minId + maxId).digest();
const bytes = Buffer.from(res);

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
const forgeUniqueConversationID = (userID: string, recipientID: string): string => {
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort();
const md5 = md.md5.create();
md5.update(minId);

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Use of a broken or weak cryptographic algorithm High test

A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.

Copilot Autofix AI 2 months ago

To fix the problem, we need to replace the MD5 hashing algorithm with a stronger alternative, such as SHA-256. This involves changing the creation and usage of the hash object from MD5 to SHA-256. Specifically, we will:

  1. Replace md.md5.create() with md.sha256.create().
  2. Ensure that the rest of the code that uses the hash object remains compatible with the new algorithm.
Suggested changeset 1
test/forge.test.ts

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/test/forge.test.ts b/test/forge.test.ts
--- a/test/forge.test.ts
+++ b/test/forge.test.ts
@@ -20,6 +20,6 @@
   const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort();
-  const md5 = md.md5.create();
-  md5.update(minId);
-  md5.update(maxId);
-  const bytes = Buffer.from(md5.digest().bytes(), 'binary');
+  const sha256 = md.sha256.create();
+  sha256.update(minId);
+  sha256.update(maxId);
+  const bytes = Buffer.from(sha256.digest().bytes(), 'binary');
 
EOF
@@ -20,6 +20,6 @@
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort();
const md5 = md.md5.create();
md5.update(minId);
md5.update(maxId);
const bytes = Buffer.from(md5.digest().bytes(), 'binary');
const sha256 = md.sha256.create();
sha256.update(minId);
sha256.update(maxId);
const bytes = Buffer.from(sha256.digest().bytes(), 'binary');

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort();
const md5 = md.md5.create();
md5.update(minId);
md5.update(maxId);

Check failure

Code scanning / CodeQL

Use of a broken or weak cryptographic algorithm High test

A broken or weak cryptographic algorithm
depends on
sensitive data from an access to userID
.

Copilot Autofix AI 2 months ago

To fix the problem, we should replace the MD5 hashing algorithm with a stronger alternative, such as SHA-256. This change will ensure that the hashing process is more secure and resistant to collision attacks.

  • General Fix: Replace the MD5 hashing algorithm with SHA-256.
  • Detailed Fix: Modify the forgeUniqueConversationID function to use SHA-256 instead of MD5. This involves changing the instantiation of the hash object and updating the relevant method calls.
  • Specific Changes:
    • Update the import statement to include SHA-256 if not already imported.
    • Replace md.md5.create() with md.sha256.create().
    • Ensure that the rest of the code in the function is compatible with the new hash object.
Suggested changeset 1
test/forge.test.ts

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/test/forge.test.ts b/test/forge.test.ts
--- a/test/forge.test.ts
+++ b/test/forge.test.ts
@@ -20,6 +20,6 @@
   const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort();
-  const md5 = md.md5.create();
-  md5.update(minId);
-  md5.update(maxId);
-  const bytes = Buffer.from(md5.digest().bytes(), 'binary');
+  const sha256 = md.sha256.create();
+  sha256.update(minId);
+  sha256.update(maxId);
+  const bytes = Buffer.from(sha256.digest().bytes(), 'binary');
 
EOF
@@ -20,6 +20,6 @@
const [minId, maxId] = [userID, recipientID].sort();
const md5 = md.md5.create();
md5.update(minId);
md5.update(maxId);
const bytes = Buffer.from(md5.digest().bytes(), 'binary');
const sha256 = md.sha256.create();
sha256.update(minId);
sha256.update(maxId);
const bytes = Buffer.from(sha256.digest().bytes(), 'binary');

Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
Positive Feedback
Negative Feedback

Provide additional feedback

Please help us improve GitHub Copilot by sharing more details about this comment.

Please select one or more of the options
@hundredark hundredark marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2024 09:09
@crossle crossle merged commit c71b7c4 into main Sep 26, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
@crossle crossle deleted the improves/size branch September 26, 2024 09:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants