Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[18.0][MIG] account_statement_import_camt: Migration to 18.0 #737

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: 18.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

xaviedoanhduy
Copy link

@xaviedoanhduy xaviedoanhduy commented Nov 8, 2024

@grindtildeath
Copy link

@xaviedoanhduy Can you rebase after merging other PRs?

i-vyshnevska and others added 22 commits December 18, 2024 06:15
Currently translated at 75.0% (9 of 12 strings)

Translation: bank-statement-import-14.0/bank-statement-import-14.0-account_statement_import_camt
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/bank-statement-import-14-0/bank-statement-import-14-0-account_statement_import_camt/nl/
Currently translated at 83.3% (10 of 12 strings)

Translation: bank-statement-import-14.0/bank-statement-import-14.0-account_statement_import_camt
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/bank-statement-import-14-0/bank-statement-import-14-0-account_statement_import_camt/it/
Encountered in a Camt.054 statement: currency listed under
/BkToCstmrDbtCdtNtfctn/Ntfctn/Ntry/Amt/@ccy
with this commit, the narration field is filled with infos find in the camt file such as reversal indicator, return reason, cheque number, ...
before only a banking ref was present.

The transaction type field is also filled.
Currently translated at 100.0% (12 of 12 strings)

Translation: bank-statement-import-16.0/bank-statement-import-16.0-account_statement_import_camt
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/bank-statement-import-16-0/bank-statement-import-16-0-account_statement_import_camt/es/
Currently translated at 100.0% (31 of 31 strings)

Translation: bank-statement-import-16.0/bank-statement-import-16.0-account_statement_import_camt
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/bank-statement-import-16-0/bank-statement-import-16-0-account_statement_import_camt/es/
Currently translated at 22.5% (7 of 31 strings)

Translation: bank-statement-import-16.0/bank-statement-import-16.0-account_statement_import_camt
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/bank-statement-import-16-0/bank-statement-import-16-0-account_statement_import_camt/it/
This refactoring will allow using `TestParser._do_parse_test()` method for subclasses defined in inheriting modules.

This way, if the new module defines new files in other paths than `account_statement_import_camt/test_files/`,
 subclasses of `TestParser` will still be able to use the `_do_parse_test()` method for imports and checks.

Moreover, a custom value can now be defined for the acceptable differing lines number between inputfile and goldenfile.

It will also maintain backward compatibility with the current usage of the method
 (ie: using only a filename with the assumption of finding it in `account_statement_import_camt/test_files/`).

NB: methods are now defined outside of `TestParser` to allow importing them directly, instead of inheriting from `TestParser`.
@xaviedoanhduy xaviedoanhduy force-pushed the 18.0-mig-account_statement_import_camt branch from 180fce9 to b686079 Compare December 17, 2024 23:15
@xaviedoanhduy
Copy link
Author

@xaviedoanhduy Can you rebase after merging other PRs?

hi @grindtildeath, done!

Copy link

@sebalix sebalix left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems like bot commits were merged in some author commits (like unrelated translation files merged in Spanish translation contribution).

Maybe you used the feature in development there? OCA/oca-port#66 (just a guess). I would consider this feature not stable enough for the moment. IMO such commits should be squashed together (bots commits into another bot commit, to not mix contributors & contributions).

If you are unsure, better to preserve the 17.0 history as-is.

@xaviedoanhduy
Copy link
Author

Seems like bot commits were merged in some author commits (like unrelated translation files merged in Spanish translation contribution).

Maybe you used the feature in development there? OCA/oca-port#66 (just a guess). I would consider this feature not stable enough for the moment. IMO such commits should be squashed together (bots commits into another bot commit, to not mix contributors & contributions).

If you are unsure, better to preserve the 17.0 history as-is.

hi @sebalix, I don't use the feature you mentioned. I just squash the administrative commits manually following this guide: https://github.com/OCA/maintainer-tools/wiki/Merge-commits-in-pull-requests#mergesquash-the-commits-generated-by-bots-or-weblate

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.