Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[13.0] [MIG] agreement sale #398

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Mar 10, 2021
Merged

Conversation

i-vyshnevska
Copy link
Member

migrate agreement sale
related to #397

@max3903
Copy link
Member

max3903 commented Oct 16, 2019

@i-vyshnevska Please have a look at #386

@gurneyalex gurneyalex mentioned this pull request Oct 17, 2019
20 tasks
@max3903 max3903 added this to the 13.0 milestone Nov 7, 2019
Copy link
Member

@jgrandguillaume jgrandguillaume left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Works well on functional side

@dreispt
Copy link
Member

dreispt commented Apr 6, 2020

There is a code formatting issue preventing a green build:
https://travis-ci.org/github/OCA/contract/jobs/602255402#L295

bealdav and others added 9 commits February 23, 2021 15:31
Currently translated at 100.0% (2 of 2 strings)

Translation: contract-12.0/contract-12.0-agreement_sale
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/contract-12-0/contract-12-0-agreement_sale/zh_CN/
we move the is_template field definition and the agreement.type model from
the agreement_legal module to the agreement module.

The fields are not displayed by default, unless the feature is enabled through a
technical feature group, this is configurable in the agreement_sale module (because agreement
in itself has no UI, and agreement_legal enables the feature by default)
@i-vyshnevska i-vyshnevska force-pushed the 13-mig-agreement-sale branch 4 times, most recently from c91ea93 to cd8af28 Compare March 1, 2021 08:21
@i-vyshnevska i-vyshnevska force-pushed the 13-mig-agreement-sale branch from cd8af28 to 896f04b Compare March 1, 2021 08:30
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@dreispt
Copy link
Member

dreispt commented Mar 10, 2021

/ocabot merge nobump

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 13.0-ocabot-merge-pr-398-by-dreispt-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

OCA-git-bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2021
Signed-off-by dreispt
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

It looks like something changed on 13.0 in the meantime.
Let me try again (no action is required from you).
Prepared branch 13.0-ocabot-merge-pr-398-by-dreispt-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 16bd2cf into OCA:13.0 Mar 10, 2021
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 3e7706b. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

olgamarcocb pushed a commit to tegin/contract that referenced this pull request Nov 16, 2021
Signed-off-by dreispt
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants