Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert to using standard microdf #299

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 29, 2024

Conversation

anth-volk
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #245.

This PR reverts to using our original version of microdf, now lightened by the use of conditional imports.

This PR will currently fail. It requires the current version of microdf to first be launched via PyPI, then for the tests to be re-run.

@anth-volk
Copy link
Contributor Author

Awaiting change to -us-data, open at PolicyEngine/policyengine-us-data#107

@anth-volk anth-volk marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2024 20:03
@anth-volk anth-volk merged commit f225d02 into PolicyEngine:master Oct 29, 2024
3 checks passed
@anth-volk anth-volk deleted the fix/original-microdf branch October 29, 2024 20:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Import microdf rather than recreating its classes
1 participant