Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include keyspace range checks on flow tests #208

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 14, 2023

Conversation

filipecosta90
Copy link
Collaborator

Up until now we didn't really checked the keyspace range after write tests. This PR introduces it.
I noticed that due to the PR #206 having a but and precisely increasing the keyspace range.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #208 (31cb241) into master (82dba6a) will increase coverage by 1.07%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #208      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.90%   56.97%   +1.07%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        4270     4270              
==========================================
+ Hits         2387     2433      +46     
+ Misses       1883     1837      -46     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
run_stats.cpp 78.28% <0.00%> (+0.26%) ⬆️
obj_gen.cpp 47.75% <0.00%> (+1.96%) ⬆️
client.cpp 63.44% <0.00%> (+2.11%) ⬆️
memtier_benchmark.cpp 53.03% <0.00%> (+3.44%) ⬆️
client.h 66.66% <0.00%> (+4.16%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

tests/include.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@filipecosta90 filipecosta90 merged commit 1620979 into RedisLabs:master Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants