Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use the more concise 'Entities Service' name throughout #70

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

CasperWA
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #62

Remove any unnecessary mention of implementation/name-specific entity implementations, i.e., SOFT and DLite.
Only use these in the specific pydantic models representing these implementation-specific data models.

Immediately prior to merging this PR, the repository name should also be updated (dlite-entities-service -> entities-service).

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (22dae4f) 98.22% compared to head (61c3fb5) 98.22%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #70   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.22%   98.22%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines         508      508           
=======================================
  Hits          499      499           
  Misses          9        9           
Flag Coverage Δ
docker 97.63% <100.00%> (ø)
local 98.22% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@CasperWA CasperWA marked this pull request as ready for review January 23, 2024 10:59
Copy link

@daniel-sintef daniel-sintef left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on my brief overview and our discussion I believe this is the correct change to make.

@CasperWA CasperWA merged commit 5f6aabb into main Jan 29, 2024
11 checks passed
@CasperWA CasperWA deleted the cwa/close-62-minimize-name branch January 29, 2024 09:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Minimize repo name
2 participants