You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The relation :poss (“possessed by”) is a very general form of possession. AMR uses it only for possessives and prepositional >phrases with “of”:
(c / car
:poss (h / he))
so here c (domain of the :poss relation) is the owned item (corresponding to :ARG1 of own-01 or have-03 )
and h (range of :poss) is the possessor (corresponding to :ARG0 of own-01 or have-03 ).
However in the reification table this is shown inverted:
Relation
Reification
Domain
Range
:poss
own-01, have-03
:ARG0
:ARG1
Is this an error in the reification table ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes I think you're right—:poss is an unusual relation in that, when reified with a predicate of ownership, the concept it introduces has a lower-numbered ARG than the concept it modifies.
The documentation says about
:poss
so here c (domain of the
:poss
relation) is the owned item (corresponding to:ARG1
ofown-01
orhave-03
)and h (range of
:poss
) is the possessor (corresponding to:ARG0
ofown-01
orhave-03
).However in the reification table this is shown inverted:
Is this an error in the reification table ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: