Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fixed liquid exchange deployment and double serializing issue #32

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024
Merged

Fixed liquid exchange deployment and double serializing issue #32

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 12, 2024

Conversation

pratraut
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed: #31

@0xJepsen 0xJepsen requested a review from Autoparallel March 12, 2024 14:51
0xJepsen
0xJepsen approved these changes Mar 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@0xJepsen 0xJepsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice work on this

0xJepsen
0xJepsen suggested changes Mar 12, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@0xJepsen 0xJepsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me so far, can we just get the fmt passing and then we can pull it in.

@pratraut
Copy link
Contributor Author

This looks good to me so far, can we just get the fmt passing and then we can pull it in.

Sure, will do it in a min.

@0xJepsen 0xJepsen merged commit 636c374 into anthias-labs:main Mar 12, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@0xJepsen 0xJepsen 0xJepsen requested changes

@Autoparallel Autoparallel Awaiting requested review from Autoparallel

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LiquidExchange is not configured properly, its failing to deploy
2 participants
@pratraut @0xJepsen