-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 473
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JAMES-2586 Postgresql implementation: ready for master #2587
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Fixed by JAMES-2586 Small codestyle refactorings.
…lict Otherwise, we could retry on other fatal errors like: io.r2dbc.postgresql.ExceptionFactory$PostgresqlBadGrammarException: column "domain" of relation "mailbox" already exists.
…olicy before alter the table
This prevents data loss.
Co-authored-by: Quan Tran <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Quan Tran <[email protected]>
…ostgres table Would be useful in case jOOQ DSL does not provide support for some queries e.g. create an EXCLUDE constraint.
Merge a few PRs parallel led to this.
Again, an issue because of merging PRs in parallel.
While not needed now this extra field would significantly ease a future JMAP Sieve implementation and avoid a migration.
…-cli GIVEN I run james-cli in kubernetes THEN the pod crashes and reboots Because the james-cli runs JVM it catches the environment variables set by James. As such it always pretouch 3GB of RAM. When added to memory consumed by James it exceeds the limit and pod get's OOM-killed.
- Ref commit: 829a63f [IMPROVEMENT] JMAP use search index relevance as default sort
…Supported - TODO - Wait to adapt James-3945 to Postgres Ref commit: 81b61ed
- Fix java.util.ConcurrentModificationException - Fix test InMemoryUploadRepositoryTest
…some test class - The RLS PostgresExtension for test case that use without domain part don't make sense
…ome methods & introduce eager fetch mode
This reverts commit 194832f.
Co-authored-by: hung phan <[email protected]>
…rators if configured
Excellent work, in my opinion |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great work, guys! While we do not quite feel qualified to review this large change set, we experimented with the work-in-progress version lately and found it to work quite well.
Nobody do! Hopefully it was built by many smaller PR against the |
Here is the final work regarding postgresql implementation with James.
Please James community help us reviewing, commenting, approving if you wish to see this work being officially merged into the main branch of the project!
Note for the team: Last two commits were added to fix the build after rebase on latest master.