Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check for a missing DT_HASH section in the VDSO parser (#1254) #1257

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025

Conversation

sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

  • Check for a missing DT_HASH section in the VDSO parser

Fix a missing check for a null hash table pointer, which can happen if the vDSO lacks a DT_HASH entry.

Also, incorporate the changes in the latest upstream version of thee reference parse_vdso.c code.

  • Fix type differences on s390x.

  • Add more tests.

* Check for a missing `DT_HASH` section in the VDSO parser

Fix a missing check for a null hash table pointer, which can happen
if the vDSO lacks a `DT_HASH` entry.

Also, incorporate the changes in the latest upstream version of thee
reference parse_vdso.c code.

* Fix type differences on s390x.

* Add more tests.
@sunfishcode sunfishcode force-pushed the sunfishcode/0.37-backport-vdso branch from 497298d to 689d655 Compare January 7, 2025 20:18
@sunfishcode sunfishcode force-pushed the sunfishcode/0.37-backport-vdso branch from 689d655 to 596184a Compare January 7, 2025 20:23
@sunfishcode sunfishcode force-pushed the sunfishcode/0.37-backport-vdso branch from 1be9105 to 31adbca Compare January 7, 2025 22:02
@sunfishcode sunfishcode merged commit f51ecb1 into 0.37 Jan 7, 2025
7 of 11 checks passed
@sunfishcode sunfishcode deleted the sunfishcode/0.37-backport-vdso branch January 7, 2025 22:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant