Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build against musl on linux #143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

Build against musl on linux #143

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024

Conversation

ouillie
Copy link
Contributor

@ouillie ouillie commented Oct 21, 2024

Switched to using cross even on the x86_64 image, because it comes pre-installed with musl-gcc. The alternative would be to add a step that does apt-get update && apt-get install musl-tools just for x86_64-unknown-linux-musl but I felt this was simpler and more consistent across the x86_64 and aarch64 linux targets.

Happy to add a comment in the YAML file if we want that.

Fix #142

@calvinrp
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you!

@calvinrp calvinrp merged commit d0eb3d4 into bytecodealliance:main Oct 21, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Can we build release binaries with static libc?
2 participants