Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: update isPaid condition for course stages #2576

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

rohitpaulk
Copy link
Member

@rohitpaulk rohitpaulk commented Jan 22, 2025

Adjust the isPaid condition to include courses at position 3. This
change ensures that the correct payment status is applied to
courses that are at the third position or higher.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted course stage pricing logic to more accurately determine paid stages based on course position.

Adjust the isPaid condition to include courses at position 3. This 
change ensures that the correct payment status is applied to 
courses that are at the third position or higher.
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the courseStageAttributesFromData function in the course creation utility. The change adjusts the condition for determining whether a course stage is marked as paid, expanding the criteria from stages after position 3 to include stages at position 3 as well. This subtle modification alters how course stages are classified in terms of payment requirements.

Changes

File Change Summary
mirage/utils/create-course-from-data.js Modified courseStageAttributesFromData function to change isPaid logic from positionWithinCourse > 3 to positionWithinCourse >= 3

Poem

🐰 A Rabbit's Course Creation Rhyme 🎓

From three and beyond, the stages now gleam,
Paid paths expanding, a developer's dream!
One little change, a symbol's slight shift,
Unlocking course stages with a mathematical lift!
Hop along, code, with your newfound grace! 🚀

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Test Results

  1 files  ±0    1 suites  ±0   6m 5s ⏱️ +4s
595 tests ±0  554 ✅ ±0  41 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
610 runs  ±0  569 ✅ ±0  41 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 73fec92. ± Comparison against base commit 29090b8.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
mirage/utils/create-course-from-data.js (1)

101-101: Document the business rule with a comment.

Consider adding a comment to explain why stage 3 and above are paid stages. This helps maintain the business logic in the test fixtures.

-    isPaid: positionWithinCourse >= 3,
+    // Stages 3 and above require payment
+    isPaid: positionWithinCourse >= 3,
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 29090b8 and 73fec92.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • mirage/utils/create-course-from-data.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
mirage/utils/create-course-from-data.js (1)

101-101: Verify test coverage for stage 3 payment status.

The change to include stage 3 as a paid stage (>= 3 instead of > 3) aligns with the PR objectives. However, we should verify that existing tests aren't assuming stage 3 is free.

✅ Verification successful

Change to include stage 3 as paid appears safe for existing tests

The codebase's test suite focuses on verifying the presence of upgrade prompts for paid stages without making assumptions about specific stage numbers. No tests were found that explicitly depend on stage 3 being free.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for tests that might be assuming stage 3 is free
rg -l "stage.*3.*free|stage.*3.*paid|isPaid.*3" tests/

Length of output: 56


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files that work with courses and stages
echo "=== Tests mentioning courses or stages ==="
rg -l "course|stage" tests/

echo -e "\n=== Mirage factory usage ==="
rg -l "createCourse" tests/

echo -e "\n=== Payment status checks in tests ==="
rg "assert.*paid|paid.*assert|isPaid" tests/

Length of output: 8485

@rohitpaulk rohitpaulk merged commit ba5f9a6 into main Jan 22, 2025
8 checks passed
@rohitpaulk rohitpaulk deleted the fix/course-isPaid-condition branch January 22, 2025 21:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant