Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update acceptance test docs #4965

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 22, 2024

Conversation

saw-jan
Copy link
Contributor

@saw-jan saw-jan commented Nov 20, 2024

Added/fixed docs and configs to run acceptance tests locally. Added instructions and commands to run tests with different storage providers.

This comment was marked as resolved.

@saw-jan saw-jan force-pushed the docs/update-acceptance-test-docs branch 3 times, most recently from 3a7a1b1 to 6b9ee76 Compare November 21, 2024 06:39
@saw-jan saw-jan marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2024 06:43
@saw-jan saw-jan requested review from labkode, glpatcern and a team as code owners November 21, 2024 06:44
@phil-davis phil-davis self-requested a review November 21, 2024 06:56
@phil-davis phil-davis self-assigned this Nov 21, 2024
docs: add makefile

docs: add README in acceptance level

docs: update configs
@saw-jan saw-jan force-pushed the docs/update-acceptance-test-docs branch from 6b9ee76 to 72bd2b3 Compare November 22, 2024 06:28
Copy link
Contributor

@phil-davis phil-davis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

tests/acceptance/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@phil-davis
Copy link
Contributor

Merging - this is only test docs, so a changelog is not needed.

@phil-davis phil-davis merged commit 45ac7ca into cs3org:edge Nov 22, 2024
8 of 10 checks passed
@saw-jan saw-jan deleted the docs/update-acceptance-test-docs branch November 22, 2024 07:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants