Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/asset lock payload #585

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024
Merged

Fix/asset lock payload #585

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 30, 2024

Conversation

pankcuf
Copy link
Collaborator

@pankcuf pankcuf commented Dec 19, 2024

Fix with asset lock payload implementation

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

Breaking Changes

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

For repository code-owners and collaborators only

  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new methods for handling payload data in transactions.
    • Enhanced size calculation for transaction data.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved synchronization in data processing methods.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes focus on enhancing the DSAssetLockTransaction class in the DashSync project. New methods are introduced to handle payload data generation and transaction size calculation. The modifications include adding payloadData and basePayloadData methods, which construct transaction payload information by appending version, credit outputs, and their details. The existing toDataWithSubscriptIndex: and size methods are updated to incorporate these new payload-related functionalities.

Changes

File Changes
DashSync/shared/Models/Transactions/Base/DSAssetLockTransaction.m - Added payloadData method
- Added basePayloadData method
- Modified toDataWithSubscriptIndex: to include payload data
- Updated size method to calculate total size with payload

Poem

🐰 Hop, hop, through transaction's maze,
Payload data now finds its ways,
Bits and bytes in perfect sync,
Asset locks dance, make networks blink!
Code rabbits cheer, transactions bright! 🔒✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@pankcuf pankcuf changed the base branch from master to develop December 19, 2024 23:59
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
DashSync/shared/Models/Transactions/Base/DSAssetLockTransaction.m (2)

80-87: Add validation for payloadData result

Consider validating the result of payloadData before appending it to avoid potential issues with corrupted or invalid payload data.

Here's a suggested improvement:

 - (NSData *)toDataWithSubscriptIndex:(NSUInteger)subscriptIndex {
     @synchronized(self) {
         NSMutableData *data = [[super toDataWithSubscriptIndex:subscriptIndex] mutableCopy];
-        [data appendCountedData:[self payloadData]];
+        NSData *payload = [self payloadData];
+        if (!payload) {
+            return nil; // or handle error appropriately
+        }
+        [data appendCountedData:payload];
         if (subscriptIndex != NSNotFound) [data appendUInt32:SIGHASH_ALL];
         return data;
     }
 }

88-90: Add safety check for size calculation

The size calculation could be incorrect if payloadData returns nil. Consider adding a safety check.

Here's a suggested improvement:

 - (size_t)size {
-    return [super size] + [self payloadData].length;
+    NSData *payload = [self payloadData];
+    return [super size] + (payload ? payload.length : 0);
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9dba479 and 9e286c7.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • Example/Podfile.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • DashSync/shared/Models/Transactions/Base/DSAssetLockTransaction.m (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
DashSync/shared/Models/Transactions/Base/DSAssetLockTransaction.m (3)

22-22: LGTM!

The added import for NSMutableData+Dash is necessary for the new payload data handling methods.


63-65: LGTM!

Good separation of concerns. The wrapper method provides a clean public interface while allowing for potential specialization in subclasses.


63-90: Verify implementation against protocol specification

Please ensure that the payload data format matches the Dash protocol specification for asset lock transactions, particularly:

  1. The order of fields in the payload
  2. The size and format of each field
  3. The handling of SIGHASH_ALL
✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response. The code analysis reveals that the implementation follows the Dash protocol's transaction type system, where Asset Lock is type 8 (DSTransactionType_AssetLock), and the payload format consists of:

  1. Special transaction version (uint8)
  2. Credit outputs count (VarInt)
  3. For each credit output:
    • Amount (uint64)
    • Output script (counted data)

The implementation in DSAssetLockTransaction matches this format exactly:

  • Correctly orders fields in payload
  • Uses proper data types and serialization
  • Properly handles SIGHASH_ALL in toDataWithSubscriptIndex

Implementation correctly follows protocol specification

  • Transaction type is properly defined as DSTransactionType_AssetLock = 8
  • Payload serialization follows the expected format
  • SIGHASH_ALL is correctly appended when generating transaction data for signing
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for protocol specification or test files
rg -g "!*.{lock,log}" -i "asset.*lock.*protocol|asset.*lock.*specification"

# Search for related test files
fd -e m -e mm "test.*assetlock|assetlock.*test"

Length of output: 127


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for test cases and usage of DSAssetLockTransaction
rg -A 5 "DSAssetLockTransaction" 

# Search for any documentation or comments about asset lock transaction format
rg -i "asset.*lock.*transaction.*format|asset.*lock.*payload"

# Look for any constant definitions related to asset lock transactions
ast-grep --pattern 'extern NSString * const $_AssetLock$_'

# Search for any protocol version or special transaction version definitions
rg "specialTransactionVersion.*asset.*lock" -A 2

Length of output: 17373


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for transaction type definitions and version information
rg "DSTransactionType_AssetLock" -A 5

# Search for any special transaction version constants or enums
rg "typedef.*SpecialTransactionVersion|enum.*SpecialTransactionVersion" -A 10

# Look for any protocol documentation in header files
fd -e h | xargs rg -l "Asset Lock" | xargs cat

# Search for any test initialization of asset lock transactions
ast-grep --pattern 'DSAssetLockTransaction *$_ = [[DSAssetLockTransaction alloc] $_'

Length of output: 15780

Comment on lines +67 to +78
- (NSData *)basePayloadData {
NSMutableData *data = [NSMutableData data];
[data appendUInt8:self.specialTransactionVersion];
NSUInteger creditOutputsCount = self.creditOutputs.count;
[data appendVarInt:creditOutputsCount];
for (NSUInteger i = 0; i < creditOutputsCount; i++) {
DSTransactionOutput *output = self.creditOutputs[i];
[data appendUInt64:output.amount];
[data appendCountedData:output.outScript];
}
return data;
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add nil check for creditOutputs array

The method could crash if self.creditOutputs is nil. Consider adding a defensive check.

Here's a suggested fix:

 - (NSData *)basePayloadData {
     NSMutableData *data = [NSMutableData data];
     [data appendUInt8:self.specialTransactionVersion];
-    NSUInteger creditOutputsCount = self.creditOutputs.count;
+    NSArray *outputs = self.creditOutputs ?: @[];
+    NSUInteger creditOutputsCount = outputs.count;
     [data appendVarInt:creditOutputsCount];
     for (NSUInteger i = 0; i < creditOutputsCount; i++) {
-        DSTransactionOutput *output = self.creditOutputs[i];
+        DSTransactionOutput *output = outputs[i];
         [data appendUInt64:output.amount];
         [data appendCountedData:output.outScript];
     }
     return data;
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- (NSData *)basePayloadData {
NSMutableData *data = [NSMutableData data];
[data appendUInt8:self.specialTransactionVersion];
NSUInteger creditOutputsCount = self.creditOutputs.count;
[data appendVarInt:creditOutputsCount];
for (NSUInteger i = 0; i < creditOutputsCount; i++) {
DSTransactionOutput *output = self.creditOutputs[i];
[data appendUInt64:output.amount];
[data appendCountedData:output.outScript];
}
return data;
}
- (NSData *)basePayloadData {
NSMutableData *data = [NSMutableData data];
[data appendUInt8:self.specialTransactionVersion];
NSArray *outputs = self.creditOutputs ?: @[];
NSUInteger creditOutputsCount = outputs.count;
[data appendVarInt:creditOutputsCount];
for (NSUInteger i = 0; i < creditOutputsCount; i++) {
DSTransactionOutput *output = outputs[i];
[data appendUInt64:output.amount];
[data appendCountedData:output.outScript];
}
return data;
}

Copy link
Member

@Syn-McJ Syn-McJ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good

@Syn-McJ Syn-McJ merged commit 6c7a5d3 into develop Dec 30, 2024
4 of 9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants