Use selective imports when importing platform-specific modules (core.sys)

[Reavershark]

Why

This makes it easier to add support for new platforms to druntime, and maintain platform-specific differences in existing ones. It better reveals the actual dependencies of each module by avoiding implicit public imports.

Progress

This is done for linux and most posix platforms.
Most imports for darwin, solaris and windows are still TODO.

Future work

I'd also like to attempt this with core.stdc. That would (in combination with this pr) open up the possibility for developers working with a Freestanding platform to get parts of druntime to work without needing an entire supported libc, just specific functions.
Also, contrary to what druntime assumes, not every platform has concepts like a filesystem, stdio, processes... This could help in determining what modules have those features as hard dependencies, and what modules could also work without them on such platforms.

[dlang-bot]

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @Reavershark! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

• My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
• My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
• I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
• New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

---

If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Your PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue.

If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog.

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "master + dmd#20632"

[dkorpel]

Is this ready for review? (Note that you don't have to do all platforms in one go, incremental work is usually preferred over huge Pull Requests)

[Reavershark]

Is this ready for review?

I think it is. I rebased and will mark this as such once ci finishes.

(Note that you don't have to do all platforms in one go, incremental work is usually preferred over huge Pull Requests)

I'll keep that in mind next time.
I'm not doing windows as it's out of my comfort zone.