Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 12, 2022. It is now read-only.

CRuntime_Musl: More fixes for time64 #3384

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stable
Choose a base branch
from
Open

CRuntime_Musl: More fixes for time64 #3384

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

omerfirmak
Copy link
Contributor 

The original PR (#3275) missed quite a few spots and conversions,
which led to the build on Alpine Linux failing with Aithmetic Exception
on core.time module constructor.
Links to the two offending commits are included.
For further issues / investigation, search for 'time64' in the git repository.

@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request and interest in making D better, @omerfirmak! We are looking forward to reviewing it, and you should be hearing from a maintainer soon.
Please verify that your PR follows this checklist:

  • My PR is fully covered with tests (you can see the coverage diff by visiting the details link of the codecov check)
  • My PR is as minimal as possible (smaller, focused PRs are easier to review than big ones)
  • I have provided a detailed rationale explaining my changes
  • New or modified functions have Ddoc comments (with Params: and Returns:)

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

If you have addressed all reviews or aren't sure how to proceed, don't hesitate to ping us with a simple comment.

Bugzilla references

Your PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue.

If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog.

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "stable + druntime#3384"

ibuclaw
ibuclaw reviewed Feb 27, 2021
View reviewed changes
src/core/stdc/time.d
public import core.sys.windows.stdc.time;
// This enum is defined only for Posix, this file is the only one
// needing it in `core.stdc`.
private enum CRuntime_Musl_Needs_Time64_Compat_Layer = false;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Perhaps all function declarations present here should be moved to core.sys.<platform>.stdc.time then.

src/core/sys/linux/sys/socket.d
{
enum SO_TIMESTAMP = 63;
enum SO_TIMESTAMPNS = 64;
enum SO_TIMESTAMPING = 65;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wait, so now there is backwards compatibility with Musl, but not older Linux kernels?

@Geod24 @omerfirmak
CRuntime_Musl: More fixes for time64
9799355 
The original PR (dlang#3275) missed quite a few spots and conversions,
which led to the build on Alpine Linux failing with Aithmetic Exception
on core.time module constructor.
Links to the two offending commits are included.
For further issues / investigation, search for 'time64' in the git repository.

Co-Authored-By: Ömer Faruk IRMAK <[email protected]>
@omerfirmak omerfirmak force-pushed the time64-strikes-again branch from 305adf8 to 9799355 Compare March 2, 2021 06:25
@RazvanN7
Copy link
Contributor

RazvanN7 commented Mar 2, 2021 •
edited
Loading

What is the relationship between this PR and #3384 ? It seems that some changes are overlapping. Why not make a single PR with multiple commits?

@kinke
Copy link
Contributor

kinke commented Mar 2, 2021

This targets stable, #3383 dmd-cxx (presumably for bootstrapping).

@RazvanN7
Copy link
Contributor

@kinke Ok to merge this?

@ibuclaw ibuclaw self-assigned this Jun 6, 2021
@dlang-bot dlang-bot added the Needs Rebase needs a `git rebase` performed label Feb 14, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Reviewers

@kinke kinke kinke left review comments

@ibuclaw ibuclaw ibuclaw left review comments

@andralex andralex Awaiting requested review from andralex

@Burgos Burgos Awaiting requested review from Burgos

@CyberShadow CyberShadow Awaiting requested review from CyberShadow

@MartinNowak MartinNowak Awaiting requested review from MartinNowak

@schveiguy schveiguy Awaiting requested review from schveiguy

@wilzbach wilzbach Awaiting requested review from wilzbach

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@ibuclaw ibuclaw

Labels
Needs Rebase needs a `git rebase` performed stable-stalled stalled
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
6 participants
@omerfirmak @dlang-bot @RazvanN7 @kinke @ibuclaw @Geod24