-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use templating to allow a more flexible type inference in QueryBuilder::setParameters()
method
#11454
Open
MatteoFeltrin
wants to merge
1
commit into
doctrine:3.1.x
Choose a base branch
from
MatteoFeltrin:use-templating-to-allow-a-more-flexible-type-inference-in-query-builder-setParameters
base: 3.1.x
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Use templating to allow a more flexible type inference in QueryBuilder::setParameters()
method
#11454
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the point? We're not getting something out of this knowledge about
TKey
, right? Maybe we should instead tellPsalm
that it's OK to pass a more specific collection, becausesetParameters
is not going to mutate it. I believe that's what@psalm-external-mutation-free
is about. Can you try annotatingsetParameters
with that annotation instead?Also, please add a test for what you are fixing under
tests/StaticAnalysis
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The point here is that
ArrayCollection<int, ...>
is too restrictive over the givenArrayCollection
when inference comes from call-time parameters.If you declare
new ArrayCollection(['a', 'b'])
, you get anArrayCollection<1|2, string>
, rather than anArrayCollection<int, string>
, which is then rejected by thisQueryBuilder
method.This generalizes
TKey
overint
, while beforeint
specifically was required. It effectively says "we don't care what kind ofint
the key is, as long as it is within the bounds of this generic type.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wasn't wondering what the point of this change was, but whether there was the point of holding the type in a dedicated
TKey
name (since we don't use it). I would prefer a syntax allowing any subtype ofint
without having to come up with a name, but if that does not exist, let's go with that. I tried my own suggestion BTW, and it does not address the issue, I'm not sure why… I don't understand why exactlyArrayCollection<1|2, string>
cannot be accepted whereArrayCollection<int, string>
is. Well, I think thought that was because the method could alter the type, but that does not seem to be it.Here is the minimal test code I used:
It might be nice to store it under
tests/StaticAnalysis/query-builder.php
, to prevent people from breaking this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not a problem of altering the type. This problem occours because when you declare an
ArrayCollection<int, string>
you are forcing the templating insideArrayCollection
class to be restricted only toint
type.When you instanciate a new ArrayCollection passing an array <0,1> as parameters, the templating now is forced to only
int<0,1>
as type, which is more specific than the one you are asking for.Using templating inside
setParameters()
allows the type to be inferred from the input parameter, with the only constrain of "extending" the int type.