Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct wrong value of Repeat DateTime ECFLOW-1993 #140

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: hotfix/5.13.7
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marcosbento
Copy link
Collaborator

Re ECFLOW-1993

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 48.82%. Comparing base (a3c110f) to head (a00b9f0).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
Viewer/ecflowUI/src/VRepeatAttr.cpp 0.00% 14 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           hotfix/5.13.7     #140      +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage          48.84%   48.82%   -0.02%     
=================================================
  Files               1184     1184              
  Lines              98267    98276       +9     
  Branches           14778    14779       +1     
=================================================
- Hits               47996    47982      -14     
- Misses             50271    50294      +23     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@marcosbento marcosbento force-pushed the fix/incorrect_date_time branch from f7db313 to a00b9f0 Compare December 11, 2024 11:16
@marcosbento marcosbento changed the title Correct wrong value of Repeat DateTime Correct wrong value of Repeat DateTime ECFLOW-1993 Dec 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants