-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft of the L2 transaction fee specification #43
Draft of the L2 transaction fee specification #43
Conversation
- Added Readme.md - Updated glossary with new terms - Added Abstract and 1.1 Overview - Added Section 2 with subsections - Section 3: Started adding requirements and testablity statements
- completed section 3.1 - sections 3.2 and 3.3 are still to do
workitems/l2-transaction-fees/l2-transaction-fees-v1.0-psd01.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
G |
- Added immutable link tags for sections - updated R10 based on feedback
A |
- fixing wording in testability for R1 - fixed layout of test steps in testability for R14
I've completed my review of the L2 Transaction Fee spec. No comments from me — I support its approval. |
workitems/l2-transaction-fees/l2-transaction-fees-v1.0-psd01.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
workitems/l2-transaction-fees/l2-transaction-fees-v1.0-psd01.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
workitems/l2-transaction-fees/l2-transaction-fees-v1.0-psd01.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Updated the following definitions: - Execution Fee - Priority Fee - Sequencer
Please, rer-eview after feedback updates. |
@lgingerich @t0mcr8se @smartcontracts please reapprove the PR! |
I'm good with the recent updates. |
- Removed Base Fee definition and updated spec accordingly - Reworded Execution Fee definition and updated spec accordingly - Added Data Fee definition and updated spec accordingly - Added 6 new requirements on L1 and L2 gas price, gas cost and calculation transparency and verification including testability statement. - Updated requirements numbers.
@smartcontracts @lgingerich @DZGoldman @t0mcr8se @0x000hx ... updated spec as discussed during our last WG meeting. Please, review and if ok, please approve. Thank you! |
I approve the latest changes |
Seems good to me |
lgtm |
We have enough approvals (4) to merge the PR and then submit it to the next PGB meeting as a draft release. |
In the initial set of commits to this PR: