Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add monitoring exex for op-rbuilder #365

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025
Merged

Add monitoring exex for op-rbuilder #365

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 22, 2025

Conversation

avalonche
Copy link
Contributor

@avalonche avalonche commented Jan 21, 2025

📝 Summary

Adds execution extension for op-rbuilder for monitoring builder transactions in the block. This ingests the committed chain and emits metrics to see if the builder transaction has landed a block or not with the op-rbuilder.

💡 Motivation and Context

Used for observability and monitoring blocks built by the op-rbuilder on optimism.


✅ I have completed the following steps:

  • Run make lint
  • Run make test
  • Added tests (if applicable)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Benchmark results for b1f8816

Report: https://flashbots-rbuilder-ci-stats.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/benchmark/b1f8816-3d00697/report/index.html

Date (UTC) 2025-01-22T20:36:13+00:00
Commit b1f8816b5387b44427b93d38dd5c5a6cb10ae872
Base SHA 3d00697c3305243b81147c498792a3dd0184441d

Significant changes

Benchmark Mean Status
MEV-Boost SubmitBlock serialization/JSON encoding -38.59% Performance has improved.

@ZanCorDX
Copy link
Contributor

Can you fix lint stuff?
Please add some Summary in your future PRs.

Base automatically changed from op-rbuilder/builder-tx to develop January 22, 2025 19:45
@avalonche avalonche merged commit 35f855e into develop Jan 22, 2025
4 checks passed
@avalonche avalonche deleted the builder-ex-ex branch January 22, 2025 20:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants