-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add 3SF concepts #91
Add 3SF concepts #91
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, left some minor comments.
A validator \(v_i\) is subject to slashing for sending two \emph{distinct} \textsc{ffg-vote}s \(\C_1 \to \C_2\) and \(\C_3 \to \C_4\) if either of the following conditions holds: {\(\mathbf{E_1}\) (Double voting)} if \(\C_2.c = \C_4.c\), implying that a validator must not cast distinct \textsc{ffg-vote}s for the same checkpoint slot; or {\(\mathbf{E_2}\) (Surround voting)} if \(\C_3 < \C_1\) | ||
and \(\C_2.c < \C_4.c\), indicating that a validator must not vote using a lower checkpoint as source and must avoid voting within the span of its other votes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is surround voting defined with "<" or "<=" ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it is defined with "<"
Co-authored-by: Kukovec <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kukovec <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kukovec <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Kukovec <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Co-authored-by: Thomas Pani <[email protected]>
No description provided.