lex: advancement in lexer implementation #13
Conversation
Signed-off-by: FedericoBruzzone <[email protected]>
FedericoBruzzone
force-pushed
the
fcb-dev
branch
from
085657d to
14d813d
Compare
Signed-off-by: FedericoBruzzone <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Federico Guerinoni <[email protected]>
FedericoBruzzone
force-pushed
the
fcb-dev
branch
from
14d813d to
fffb17d
Compare
Signed-off-by: FedericoBruzzone <[email protected]>
FedericoBruzzone
changed the title
list initializationSigned-off-by: FedericoBruzzone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: FedericoBruzzone <[email protected]>
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | |||
| x_func: () -> unit = () -> print "hello" ; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In this case print what is it? identifier but why? later can be parsed and found as another func?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Function invocation does not require ().
I expect that when visiting the AST we will have a symbol table in that we will have all our functions, BUT at the same time we will have a separate symbol table for the functions that our stdlib will provide.
In this case in the symbol table of the stdlib there will be defined the print (and probably the Optional type, hd function to get the head of a list etc...)
| TokenKind::TokenPlus => write!(f, "TokenPlus"), | ||
| TokenKind::TokenMinus => write!(f, "TokenMinus"), | ||
| TokenKind::TokenMultiply => write!(f, "TokenMultiply"), | ||
| TokenKind::TokenDivide => write!(f, "TokenDivide"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we should add those also for assignment/initialization
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What do you mean by this comment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Support for
x = x + 1 and friends
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It should already be covered!
I'll try to write two tests to add to this PR 👍
listinitializationtupleinitializationunittypefunctioninitialization+,-,*,/(basic)operatorsin functionsStateSymbolstruct