Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix #9548 Improve accuracy of docs for condition arch(name) #9549

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2023
Merged

Fix #9548 Improve accuracy of docs for condition arch(name) #9549

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2023

Conversation

mpilgrem
Copy link
Collaborator

@mpilgrem
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There is an interaction with #9535. If this PR is merged first, #9535 will need to be modified to update the documenttion. If #9535 is merged first, then this PR will need to be amended as powerpc64 and powerpc64le will then be distinguished.

Mikolaj
Mikolaj approved these changes Dec 21, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Mikolaj Mikolaj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! Let me also provide a crosslink to #9548.

@mpilgrem mpilgrem added the merge me Tell Mergify Bot to merge label Dec 21, 2023
@mergify mergify bot added the merge delay passed Applied (usually by Mergify) when PR approved and received no updates for 2 days label Dec 23, 2023
@mergify mergify bot merged commit 8070ab1 into master Dec 23, 2023
12 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the fix9548 branch December 23, 2023 13:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@geekosaur geekosaur geekosaur approved these changes

@Mikolaj Mikolaj Mikolaj approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
merge delay passed Applied (usually by Mergify) when PR approved and received no updates for 2 days merge me Tell Mergify Bot to merge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@mpilgrem @Mikolaj @geekosaur