Update release files 12 November 2024

[matentzn]

No description provided.

[jamesaoverton]

Looking through the commits to master since the last release, I expected to see 'has symbol' #167 here, but I don't. Maybe 'annotation-properties' needs to be rebuilt?

I do see #168 and #178, which is good.

[matentzn]

Looking through the commits to master since the last release, I expected to see 'has symbol' #167 here, but I don't. Maybe 'annotation-properties' needs to be rebuilt?

Oops yea, forgot to rerun the templates workflow.

@zhengj2007 @jamesaoverton should be ready now!

[jamesaoverton]

Now I see the new terms in the OWL files but not the OBO files. Is that expected?

[zhengj2007]

Missing new annotation property 'has symbol' in OBO format OMO. Need to be updated.

[matentzn]

Good we looked at this - few Annotation properties are actually converted into OBO format. Maybe this has to do with the fact that they are not used in the same ontology they are declared?

In any case, I vote to drop OBO support from OMO. I cant imagine anyone using it for anything but as an import into another ontology, which is always done through OWL API so always done through OWL..

I would suggest we merge this here because the problem was always present.

[jamesaoverton]

I would suggest we merge this here because the problem was always present.

Agreed -- the OBO-format releases never had any annotation properties, so no big loss.