-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 914
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix get protocol and path #4409
Open
ElenaKhaustova
wants to merge
4
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fix/3196-get-protocol-and-path
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this essentially
https://github.com/fsspec/filesystem_spec/blob/1d34249f0b043907f86064c274a33454ec670ebe/fsspec/utils.py#L112-L115
?
If so, are we ready to dump this function and use
fsspec.utils.infer_storage_options
?I feel like we should try to converge with fsspec ASAP - bug by bug, if need be! and contribute the fixes upstream
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure I fully understand the first question, but from what I got: It's not the same because we output a different format and the difference is in the way we build the return output.
Looks like our
_parse_filepath
is based onfsspec.utils.infer_storage_options
but it does a different thing as we only split protocol from the rest of the path but the last split all of them plus some extra logic on top.We cannot replace them as is, meaning that
fsspec.utils.infer_storage_options
needs to be updated to comply with Kerdo downstream logic. This might work for us, but it's out of the scope of this ticket and can be discussed separately.So my suggestion is to fix the bug first, then decide on replacing the existing logic with fsspec-based.