[doc] Update guide for quick start single dc (#1423) #3893
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
12s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
Annotations
12 errors and 18 warnings
ClassSizeEstimatorTest.testClassOverhead[1](EMPIRICAL_MEASUREMENT):
internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/ClassSizeEstimatorTest.java#L37
java.lang.AssertionError: Class ClassWithOnePublicPrimitiveFloatField has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (10.76076) which is too far from the predictedUsage (16); delta: 0.327; maxAllowedDelta: 0.093. No more attempts left.
|
ClassSizeEstimatorTest.testClassOverhead[1](EMPIRICAL_MEASUREMENT):
internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/ClassSizeEstimatorTest.java#L37
java.lang.AssertionError: Class ClassWithOnePublicPrimitiveFloatField has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (10.76076) which is too far from the predictedUsage (16); delta: 0.327; maxAllowedDelta: 0.093. No more attempts left.
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248)
However, there were exactly 28832 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1277375552
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1277375552
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736473069042},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1277375552
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736473069042}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latest
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248)
However, there were exactly 24564 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1409698562
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1409698562
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736473002142},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1409698562
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736473002142}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latest
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248)
However, there were exactly 28832 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1277375552
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1277375552
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736473069042},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1277375552
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736473069042}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_a8ad2117b0_741e941c_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latest
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248)
However, there were exactly 24564 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1409698562
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1409698562
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736473002142},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1409698562
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1, attempts=2, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736473002142}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_9917a9a9af_46aa9a82_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latest
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L133
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007f8718748ab0@4f439f90
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007f8718748ab0@7afb2ac9
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736473094999, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736473094999, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736473095000, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736473095000, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007f8718748ab0@317ebbe
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007f8718748ab0@5fb47862
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248)
However, there were exactly 28858 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1794207171
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1794207171
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736472964887},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1794207171
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736472964887}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1621)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007f8718748ab0@4f439f90
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007f8718748ab0@7afb2ac9
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736473094999, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736473094999, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736473095000, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1736473095000, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007f8718748ab0@317ebbe
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_99168c921d_67a7de24_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$1006/0x00007f8718748ab0@5fb47862
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:33)
|
SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testProcessConsumerActionsError:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportError(
<any string>,
1,
<Capturing argument>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.reportError(StoreIngestionTask.java:4248)
However, there were exactly 28858 interactions with this mock:
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.runTest(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:886)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(
TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1,
true
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:615)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.throwIfNotRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:576)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.nextSeqNum();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.subscribePartition(StoreIngestionTask.java:638)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.run();
-> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:539)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1627)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.getIsRunning();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.isRunning(StoreIngestionTask.java:4081)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1794207171
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1629)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.isHybridMode();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.updateIngestionRoleIfStoreChanged(StoreIngestionTask.java:1546)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1794207171
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.run(StoreIngestionTask.java:1630)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736472964887},
Mock for Store, hashCode: 1794207171
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1919)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(
KafkaTaskMessage{type=SUBSCRIBE, topicPartition=TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1, attempts=4, sequenceNumber=1, createdTimestampInMs=1736472964887}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.processConsumerAction(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:569)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.reportIfCatchUpVersionTopicOffset(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestIgnoredUpstreamRTOffsetMap={}, latestRTOffsetTriedToProduceToVTMap{}, offsetRecord=OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=-1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}}, errorReported=false, started=false, lagCaughtUp=false, processedRecordSizeSinceLastSync=0, leaderFollowerState=STANDBY}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processCommonConsumerAction(StoreIngestionTask.java:2164)
leaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.updateLeaderTopicOnFollower(
PCS{replicaId=TestTopic_7aca3f04b1_74aefa8d_v1-1, hybrid=false, latestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset=-1, latestProcessedUpstreamVersionTopicOffset=
|
ValidateGradleWrapper
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Router / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
StaticAnalysis (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Controller / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Internal / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Server / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (8)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (11)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Clients / UT & CodeCov (17)
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
ubuntu-latest pipelines will use ubuntu-24.04 soon. For more details, see https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/10636
|
Artifacts
Produced during runtime
Name | Size | |
---|---|---|
StaticAnalysis
|
630 KB |
|
clients-jdk11
|
2.87 MB |
|
clients-jdk17
|
2.89 MB |
|
clients-jdk8
|
2.81 MB |
|
controller-jdk11
|
1.33 MB |
|
controller-jdk17
|
1.33 MB |
|
controller-jdk8
|
1.33 MB |
|
internal-jdk11
|
3.05 MB |
|
internal-jdk17
|
3.06 MB |
|
internal-jdk8
|
3.03 MB |
|
router-jdk11
|
598 KB |
|
router-jdk17
|
597 KB |
|
router-jdk8
|
588 KB |
|
server-jdk11
|
9.13 MB |
|
server-jdk17
|
9.42 MB |
|
server-jdk8
|
9.25 MB |
|