Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove invalid url #343

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wyu71
Copy link
Contributor

@wyu71 wyu71 commented Dec 20, 2024

remove invalid url

Log: remove invalid url

remove invalid  url

Log: remove invalid  url
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见:

  1. 注释更新

    • 在多个文件的mouseMoveEvent函数中,注释已经从包含完整的bug链接更新为只包含bug编号。这是一个好的做法,因为链接可能不总是必要的,特别是当bug已经解决并且不再需要跟踪时。
  2. 代码重复

    • 所有文件的mouseMoveEvent函数实现都是相同的,即忽略事件并立即返回。这种重复代码可以通过提取一个公共函数来减少,从而提高代码的可维护性。
  3. 未使用的参数

    • 使用Q_UNUSED(event);来忽略未使用的参数是一个好的实践,但可以进一步改进。在C++11及更高版本中,可以使用[[maybe_unused]]属性来标记未使用的参数,这样编译器就不会发出警告。
  4. 代码风格

    • QGraphicsViewEx类的构造函数中,注释的格式不一致。建议保持一致的注释风格,以提高代码的可读性。
  5. 代码安全性

    • 没有发现明显的安全问题,但建议在处理鼠标事件时,确保对输入参数进行适当的验证,以防止潜在的未定义行为。
  6. 性能考虑

    • 当前提交中没有性能相关的改进,但建议在未来的提交中,如果mouseMoveEvent函数的实现变得更加复杂,考虑是否有必要添加性能优化措施。

综上所述,代码的注释更新是合理的,但可以通过减少重复代码和改进代码风格来进一步提高代码质量。同时,建议在处理鼠标事件时,注意参数的验证和潜在的性能优化。

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pengfeixx, wyu71

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wyu71 wyu71 merged commit efaf6f6 into linuxdeepin:release/1050U2 Dec 20, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants