Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sync: from linuxdeepin/dtkgui #102

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2025
Merged

sync: from linuxdeepin/dtkgui #102

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 9, 2025

Conversation

deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkgui.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkgui#296

Synchronize source files from linuxdeepin/dtkgui.

Source-pull-request: linuxdeepin/dtkgui#296
@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: deepin-ci-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@deepin-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor Author

deepin pr auto review

代码审查意见:

  1. MoveWindowHelper类的析构函数中,将qobject_cast替换为static_cast可能是因为parent()返回的类型已经确定,不需要进行类型转换。但是,如果parent()返回的类型不是QWindow*,那么使用static_cast可能会导致未定义行为。建议确认parent()返回的类型,或者使用dynamic_cast进行更安全的类型转换。

  2. DTreeLandPlatformWindowHelper类的析构函数中,添加了注释// see tst_qwindow.cpp tst_QWindow::qobject_castOnDestruction(),这表明存在一个相关的测试用例。建议查看该测试用例,了解为什么需要使用static_cast而不是qobject_cast

  3. DTreeLandPlatformWindowHelper类的析构函数中,windowMap.remove(static_cast<QWindow*>(parent()));这行代码使用了static_cast,但是没有检查parent()是否为nullptr。如果parent()nullptr,那么static_cast可能会导致未定义行为。建议在调用static_cast之前添加对parent()是否为nullptr的检查。

  4. 代码中没有明显的语法或逻辑错误。

  5. 代码中没有明显的性能问题。

  6. 代码中没有明显的安全问题。

@18202781743 18202781743 merged commit 87ea997 into master Jan 9, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@18202781743 18202781743 deleted the sync-pr-296-nosync branch January 9, 2025 06:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants