Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes write table for date type #33

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 13, 2024
Merged

Conversation

liweiyi88
Copy link
Owner

@liweiyi88 liweiyi88 commented Aug 13, 2024

No description provided.

@liweiyi88 liweiyi88 marked this pull request as ready for review August 13, 2024 00:25
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes enhance the MysqlNativeDump functionality by modifying how DATE values are handled, transitioning from time.Time to []uint8. This adjustment simplifies code maintenance and improves flexibility in date representation. Additionally, related test cases and SQL schema updates have been made to align with this new data type, allowing for better integration and accuracy in handling date-related data.

Changes

Files Change Summary
dumper/mysqlnativedump.go, dumper/mysqlnativedump_test.go Altered writeTableContent to handle DATE as []uint8 instead of time.Time; updated tests to reflect new date representation and validation logic.
testutils/onedump_mysql.sql Added a date column to the onedump table, updated INSERT statements to include date values.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant MysqlNativeDump
    participant Database

    Client->>MysqlNativeDump: writeTableContent()
    MysqlNativeDump->>Database: Insert date as []uint8
    Database-->>MysqlNativeDump: Confirm insertion
    MysqlNativeDump-->>Client: Return success
Loading

🐰 In the garden, dates now bloom,
With bytes instead of time's own loom.
A hop, a skip, a joyful cheer,
For changes bright that draw us near!
Let's dance with data, fresh and bright,
With every byte, our future's light! ✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.81%. Comparing base (97f1b60) to head (22a2b44).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #33      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.79%   77.81%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        1333     1334       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1037     1038       +1     
  Misses        227      227              
  Partials       69       69              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 027873b and 22a2b44.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • dumper/mysqlnativedump.go (2 hunks)
  • dumper/mysqlnativedump_test.go (3 hunks)
  • testutils/onedump_mysql.sql (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
testutils/onedump_mysql.sql (2)

50-50: Add date column to onedump table.

The addition of the date column enhances the schema to store date values. Ensure that this change is compatible with existing data and applications using this table.


64-65: Update INSERT INTO statement to include date column.

The INSERT INTO statement now includes the date column, with a value of '2024-06-17'. Ensure that this date format aligns with your application's requirements and any existing data handling logic.

dumper/mysqlnativedump_test.go (3)

92-93: Update mock data to use []uint8 for DATE type.

The mock data now uses a byte slice to represent the DATE type, aligning with the new handling logic. Ensure that this representation is consistent across all relevant test cases.


105-105: Modify column definitions to use []uint8 for DATE type.

The column definition in the test has been updated to expect []uint8 for the DATE type. Ensure that this change is reflected in all relevant parts of the test suite.


197-197: Update expected error messages for DATE type parsing.

The expected error messages now reflect the change to []uint8 for DATE types. Ensure that these messages are accurate and informative for debugging purposes.

dumper/mysqlnativedump.go (1)

186-191: Handle DATE type as []uint8.

The writeTableContent function now expects DATE values to be []uint8. Ensure that this change is consistent with the rest of the codebase and that any potential issues with type mismatches are addressed.

@liweiyi88 liweiyi88 merged commit 53f7f75 into main Aug 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@liweiyi88 liweiyi88 deleted the fix-write-table-for-date-type branch August 13, 2024 00:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant