port to elpi 2.0 #462
Merged
port to elpi 2.0 #462
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
gares
force-pushed
the
elpi-2.0
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9b19687 to
ab3ec8e
Compare
|
The main downside is that I had to remove Elpi Typecheck, since it emits a warning that is made fatal. |
|
@Tragicus @CohenCyril this update to the software stack should make the coercion/cs elpi hooks much faster to call. If you are still working on these it may be worth giving it a try. |
|
I forgot I could disable the warning about Elpi Typecheck, now this PR can be merged with no downsides. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See LPCIC/elpi#269 and LPCIC/coq-elpi#708