Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MeltShiny – The Rollercoaster Ride of Code and Collaboration #150

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

BollepalliPranitha
Copy link
Collaborator

What was changed?
Introduced a detailed blog page documenting the MeltShiny development journey.
Includes highlights of project milestones, team collaboration, sprint retrospectives, and challenges overcome.
Added relevant images and visuals to make the content more engaging.
Structured the page with clear sections for readability.

Why was it changed?
To provide transparency and celebrate the collaborative efforts of the team in building MeltShiny.
A dedicated blog page serves as a communication medium for the project's philosophy and encourages participation from the open-source community.

How was it tested?
Verified that the blog page renders correctly and aligns with the existing website styling.
Checked that images load properly and links within the page navigate to the correct sections in localhost

Copy link
Collaborator

@kungfuchicken kungfuchicken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did MeltShiny hit any critical milestones recently, like a public launch? I'm not sure this overall fits the tone and type of content we're looking for here. There are great insights that are useful reflections, but we need to stay focused on presenting the Open Source with SLU program and it's accomplishments. It is not a personal reflection blog. Our target audience is academics and funders.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants