-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 594
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(ParseObject): enable subclasses to set initial values for props #924
Open
RaschidJFR
wants to merge
7
commits into
parse-community:alpha
Choose a base branch
from
RaschidJFR:bugfix/retrieve-subclass-objects
base: alpha
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d0f48aa
test(ParseCloudeTest): add case 'retrieve subclass objects'
RaschidJFR d961397
test(ParseCloudTed): moved test 'retrieve subclass objects'
RaschidJFR a6d613d
feat(ParseObject): enable subclasses to set initial values for props
RaschidJFR 0331efd
Merge branch 'master' into bugfix/retrieve-subclass-objects
dplewis 93deba3
Merge branch 'master' into bugfix/retrieve-subclass-objects
dplewis 8c9bf87
fix(ParseObject): remove reserved fields in `fromJSON()`
RaschidJFR 9b5c177
Merge branch 'master' into bugfix/retrieve-subclass-objects
dplewis File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
const o = constructor ? new constructor(json) : new ParseObject(json.className)
should be fine for your test to work.There are other issues this brings up. There are other Subclasses of ParseObject like
_User
and_Session
that will try to set readonly fields. You could try to clone the json and delete the readonly fields before passing to the constructor but I don't know what other issue this would cause.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@RaschidJFR Thoughts?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, sorry I didn’t reply earlier. I’ve already done that with good results. Haven’t pushed though.
I’ve got almost all tests passing now, just a couple left. What I’m trying to figure out now is a way to prevent pending ops from overwriting the properties set in the constructor.
Tomorrow I’ll push my progress so anyone can have a look.